To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [NV-L] Linux nodes |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:42:52 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:11:02 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F01270846@nlspm204.emea.corp.eds.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
I have no difficulties discovering either 32-bit nor 64-bit Linux, so long as the community string is correct and the node responds to snmpwalk. My only suggestion is the same as before. If you cannot determine the source of the problem from the netmon trace, then a call to Support is in order. But if you are not on FixPack4, I'd advise you to get there first. All of their systems will be current.
James, Thanks for your reply. I made exactly what you instructed, but couldn't find the answer from the trace logs. What strange is that I found 32-bit Linux machine has no problem while only 64-bit Linux machine has the problem I described below. They are having exactly the same configurations. Any suggestions? regards, David From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of James Shanks Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:58 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: Re: [NV-L] Linux nodes Discovery problems are always solved the same way. Get a netmon trace.
Dear list, NV714, FP3 on Solaris. I have some Linux nodes (SUSE 9) which need to be monitored by Netview. snmpwalk is OK, but cannot be discovered, or some discovered but after a while interface deleted by Netview (but the node is not deleted, thus showed blue in Netview, because no interface). I have browsed the archive, but couldn't find the answer. Please help. Regards, David_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [NV-L] $NVSEV variable always set to 1, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Linux nodes, Liu, David |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] Mapping varbind 2 for TEC messes up hostname, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web