To: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com>, Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Application reached maximum number of outstanding events, |
From: | Larry Fagan <larrytechie@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:00:09 -0700 (PDT) |
Cc: | |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:10:35 +0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=PFtkrZe0dgL1vIMryj6SAYkYe9vEHizSKzRssPi2I57/an4T46W+B9W8NEjJC2oPRkkV239dD9uHIvHJUrcWDQCllDoNu4crFoJH1reVY4gqVvBsJjE3nOoA0uyxbGpQhvez8/vnlbpz7JAFdAQL+xOVJvjVTdY6fVG1jFryJec=; |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF8D02912C.D5315929-ON852572A1.0005A95B-852572A1.000829F8@us.ibm.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | larrytechie@yahoo.com, Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
James, thanks for looking into the issue.. Below are answers to the questions and some more info.. This issue happenned before about 6 months or so back and IBM support asked me to increase the application queque log size from 2000 to 10000 and the issue vanished. So this started again last week and i again increased from 10000 to 15000 and has not happenned again. I'm not sure if that's the issue... -When i check nvstatus, all are up and running -Yes, popup "nvcorrd is running" is displayed when NetView console is open when this issue happens -Yes, we keep adding router or switches or server as trap destination as our Netview server every other day. I don't see any trap storms. If so , theh why does'nt happen evry often? -Did'nt add any rule set off late. Does'nt look like rule set issue. - no changes to ESE. automation, TEC rule set Do you think,by upgrading to latest version, are the netmon, trapd are better capable for performance. As is said, i have 7.1.3 FP3. Which is the most stable current version to upgrade to? Thanks in advance as usual. Larry James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] NV sending FQDN to TEC in IP address field ???, Michael D Schleif |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [NV-L] Flitering Traps on NetView 7.1.4, Usman Taokeer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] Application reached maximum number of outstanding events,, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] 7.1.5 AIX remote upgrade, Zoeckler, Eric A. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web