Does the ACK clear from the network properly when connectivity is restored?
________________________________
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com on behalf of Leslie Clark
Sent: Tue 3/27/2007 11:34 AM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces
That's how it works, in my experience. I usually ack the network.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
"Rob Rinear" <rob.rinear@engyro.com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
03/27/2007 11:09 AM
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
To
<nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
cc
Subject
[NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces
I am running Netview for Windows 7.1.5 and, when a router goes Unreachable,
acknowledging the interfaces does not propagate up. The node and networks
remain white. This only happens for unreachable; acknowledging down interfaces
on a marginal router/node will propagate as expected.
I found hits regarding the variable OVW_NO_UNREACHABLE_PROPAGATION, but that
seems to control the propagation of unreachable, not the ACK, and the related
APAR states the variable has no effect when all interfaces are unreachable,
anyway.
One workaround is to ACK the node, also, be we have had occasions where the
node ACK does not clear when the interfaces do, and it remains dark green event
though it is completely up.
Can anyone confirm similar behavior and offer any better solution?
Thanks,
Rob _______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
<<winmail.dat>> _______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
|