To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:22:51 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:23:46 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C76B77E2713BCC419CA391741237F071A567A7@copper.dirigo.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Yes. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Does the ACK clear from the network properly when connectivity is restored? ________________________________ From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com on behalf of Leslie Clark Sent: Tue 3/27/2007 11:34 AM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: Re: [NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces That's how it works, in my experience. I usually ack the network. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager "Rob Rinear" <rob.rinear@engyro.com> Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com 03/27/2007 11:09 AM Please respond to Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> To <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> cc Subject [NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces I am running Netview for Windows 7.1.5 and, when a router goes Unreachable, acknowledging the interfaces does not propagate up. The node and networks remain white. This only happens for unreachable; acknowledging down interfaces on a marginal router/node will propagate as expected. I found hits regarding the variable OVW_NO_UNREACHABLE_PROPAGATION, but that seems to control the propagation of unreachable, not the ACK, and the related APAR states the variable has no effect when all interfaces are unreachable, anyway. One workaround is to ACK the node, also, be we have had occasions where the node ACK does not clear when the interfaces do, and it remains dark green event though it is completely up. Can anyone confirm similar behavior and offer any better solution? Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only)
winmail.dat _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [NV-L] acknowledge, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [NV-L] acknowledge, Hill, Channing |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging UNREACHABLE interfaces, Rob Rinear |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] NV-L, durga priya |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web