To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Finished scan? |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:07:45 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:25:10 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <4B7EE6C5FCFF304D9A1880844C82AE460215165E@na1fcm08.dearborn.ford.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Those are 'hints'. First it goes through that whole list and makes hints with just those two fields. Eventually (probably before it makes 84K hints) it will start making networks and segments to support the addresses and masks, if it knows them, then it will make interfaces to put on the networks, and then it will make the nodes. So doing it that way, with a very long explicit list, can look like it takes a very long time. You might just give it overnight and check again. It sounds pretty normal. Probably in the long run it will take the same amount of time, but there are other ways to approach it. One would be to make the range rules, as I am sure you have tried, and then run a ping script that pings all of those addresses from the outside. That would be a 'one at a time' (one interface, network, and node) approach that might give you more immediate feedback than the method you are using now, which is more batch-oriented (make all the hints, then make all the networks....etc). One down side of doing it with a long explicit list is that Netview kind of hopes that all those entries are SNMP. You can end up with a lot of bad subnet assignments if you don't have some routers in there first, so real subnets are created. Then the things that are non-snmp are likely to be assigned to good subnets. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Dear learned folks: I have a seedfile that is 84444 entries long. I don't see any other "A node added" records in my trapd.log from restarting netmon. It looks like the discovery only took about an hour. I tried to tease about the data with: nvUtil e isNode=TRUE But I have a lot of entries in the database that look like this: bkain1@fcis249:~ $ ovobjprint -s fcas534.dearborn.ford.com
OBJECT: 5480 FIELD ID
FIELD NAME
FIELD VALUE So isNode didn't pick it up. Is discovery finished? Why aren't the entries for most nodes being filled in? Thanks _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] SNMP trap receipt on HACMP interface, Barr, Scott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [NV-L] SNMP trap receipt on HACMP interface, Erdey, Raymond M |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] SNMP trap receipt on HACMP interface, Sean Lawrence |
Next by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Finished scan?, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web