Re: [NV-L] Netview Correlation

To:	"Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject:	Re: [NV-L] Netview Correlation
From:	"Nicholas Ho" <nickho1972@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:43:51 -0600
Delivery-date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:55:22 +0100
Dkim-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cd5XZ/M3Xuy/RZpnvH/se/SAfNOrupOhdDkFCaPCprSHiXhFEFxzZWshg1y/XZjjYcSqYiKkSrK13oi2oG9t19kAed7vC2jLWuqzewfavlci1y/31Ho4kROAvhSxFXE9d2X6khAPhbagoISMC0OvTWH10xRevA4bxvZYWnn2+D8=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fEL3M/H/Xqj9FDcqwQaL0jqZqataj0yvTuS1xcuTV5PZO867ukV7xvt15MT1T6uOzuR0WosGC3fwF9KRE8LzYM4jZDEDbpFjmmTMdiHgwm6fGhr7ryjS+ZFnAGbj9VrkVC9bRm9vYl1bRCZJRz6LHDn5plWr/jy3m+tIoKh9UQc=
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to:	<9b33e50c0706140558l6265c5a2mdef02637a4017e0d@mail.gmail.com>
List-help:	<mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post:	<mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<9b33e50c0706140558l6265c5a2mdef02637a4017e0d@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to:	Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender:	nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

Not sure how NetView does this, but this is a standard, out of the box feature of all versions of Precision IP (soon to be known as ITNM). Are you thinking about migrating to Precision IP/ITNM?

On 6/14/07, sudha g <sudha.unix@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I need to correlate events like,

If the switch goes down, i'll get events like switch down and servers connected to that switches not reachable and the root cause should be

All the Servers are down because the Switch is down.

Any input on this?

Thanks & Regards,

Sudhakar Gandhi

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only)

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[NV-L] Netview Correlation, sudha g [NV-L] Object ID, ronald . ross Re: [NV-L] Netview Correlation, Nicholas Ho <= RE: [NV-L] Netview Correlation, Evans, Bill

Previous by Date:	RE: [NV-L] OS SNMP Monitoring, Glen Warn
Next by Date:	RE: [NV-L] Netview Correlation, Evans, Bill
Previous by Thread:	[NV-L] Object ID, ronald . ross
Next by Thread:	RE: [NV-L] Netview Correlation, Evans, Bill
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]