To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:53:08 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:53:48 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <FD28A00D682EC941879EBFEAB2C83317029EDC09@TRVMSG.ustr.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Well, you could adjust the formatting of the trap in trapd.conf to include the variables $E $e $G $S, if they are not already there. Then you can look at them in trapd.log at your leisure. The $E and $e will give you both the named enterprise, and the raw number. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Yes, that is true. So I presume if I add a 0 suffix to the enterprise ID may resolve the issue. Moreover, I have enabled the nvcorrd debug (nvcdebug –d rules) but the logs are being written so fast that I am not able to follow it. Would you please help me to get this sorted? Thanks Senny From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:53 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec Not so. The trap formatting is more forgiving. An enterprise of 1.3.6.1.4.1 in trapd.conf will match 1.3.6.1.4.1.* from a device. So there is hope. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com> Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com 02/24/2009 12:36 AM Please respond to Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> To "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> cc Subject RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec Thanks Leslie! I shall definitely do that and try to trace where is the root cause. I have one more query, if the trapd.log is showing the message from device properly formatted, does that mean the trap format is proper and enterprise ID also matching. I assume if the enterprise ID the device is sending is not matching with the trap definition what we loaded on NetView, then the trapd.log will show unknown format. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks Senny From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:44 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec The most likely cause is that the traps from the devices and the traps you are generating are not using the exact same enterprise, generic, and specific trap ids. Devices don't always send what you expect from looking at the MIB. Sometimes there is an extra 0 or something on the enterprise. To see what exactly is coming in from the devices. you need to turn on tracing. nvcdebug -d rules Then watch in /usr/OV/log/nvcorrd.alog and blog to see how it is deciding whether to forward or not. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com> Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com 02/23/2009 10:24 AM Please respond to Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> To "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> cc Subject RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec Thanks James! But I have the rule specified in my ruleset TEC_ITS.rs to forward the events to TEC. Moreover when I try to send a test trap with the same enterprise ID using SNMPTRAP utility, I can see these events are being forwarded to TEC. Here my issue is with the traps forwarded by the actual device those are not reaching TEC; though it manages to reach in trapd.log. Also I checked and all the event property under discussion is in “Status Events”. Still need help☺ Regards Senny _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [NV-L] Netview SNMPv3 support, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec, Senthil Kumar Mani |
Next by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec, Senthil Kumar Mani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web