nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [NV-L] Discovery X subnet

To: "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Discovery X subnet
From: "Amir, Mohammed - Corporate Core - ICT Services" <Mohammed.Amir@Oxfordshire.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:16:09 +0100
Cc: <nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:20:08 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <OF482A7A2A.6BAEEF39-ON8525775A.0040E91B-8525775A.004139F4@ca.ibm.com>
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTinartodaPLI1ROY99jrymrPxSv8_xCOzFuefkKp@mail.gmail.com><OFD26AE4B7.72FA42B4-ON85257759.006193DA-85257759.0061D091@ca.ibm.com><AANLkTilc3eo736shvQcXB3Kshiod2xeLIPVGnPLXDvah@mail.gmail.com> <OF482A7A2A.6BAEEF39-ON8525775A.0040E91B-8525775A.004139F4@ca.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcselKH2Pftx+niSQ0y29ljL5DF9WQAApK+A
Thread-topic: [NV-L] Discovery X subnet
Hi,

Please could I be take me off this list as we no longer have use of Tivoli 
products. Many thanks.

Kind Regards,
 
Mohammed Amir
Senior Systems Engineer
 
Oxfordshire County Council
ICT Corporate Core 
3rd Floor, Clarendon House
52 Cornmarket Street
Oxford OX1 3EJ
DDI : 01865 328874
Mobile : 07810 656 424
mohammed.amir@oxfordshire.gov.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On 
Behalf Of Francois Le Hir
Sent: 08 July 2010 12:52
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Cc: Tivoli NetView Discussions; nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Discovery X subnet

If a good subnet already exists, the new nodes that get discovered will
automatically be connected to it.
If you can not solve the snmp access, and you have at least one device with
snmp access for each subnet, a solution is to get all these devices with
snmp access discovered first so that the subnets will be created with the
correct mask. And then the nodes without snmp access will connect to the
existing subnets. You can also use loadhost to create the first interface
of a subnet with the right mask.

Salutations, / Regards,

Francois Le Hir
Network Projects & Consulting Services
IBM Global Technology Services


"Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and
leave a trail."  -  Ralph Waldo Emerson.


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Marcelo Zacchi <mzacchi@gmail.com>                                           
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>                           
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com                                                
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |07/08/2010 06:44 AM                                                          
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [NV-L] Discovery X subnet                                                
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Sent by:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com                                                
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Hello Francois,

Thanks for your reply!

You're right! All of these equipments are nor responding to SNMP polls. But
why does it happen only to some SNMP-unresponsive devices? There are quite
a few devices that are monitored using ICMP and are placed automatically on
the correct subnet.

Best regards,
Marcelo

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Francois Le Hir <flehir@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
  It all depend of the snmp access to the device that has an ip in the
  subnet. If there is no snmp access, then netview will assume the mask of
  the subnet based on the class of the subnet. 10.x is a class A so the
  mask
  will be 255.0.0.0.
  If you want to correct that after the fact, the only way it to delete the
  subnet and the device and start over.
  It's always better to configure the community string in netview before
  you
  get a device discovered.

  Salutations, / Regards,

  Francois Le Hir
  Network Projects & Consulting Services
  IBM Global Technology Services

  "Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and
  leave a trail."  -  Ralph Waldo Emerson.


  |------------>
  | From:      |
  |------------>

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   |Marcelo Zacchi <mzacchi@gmail.com>
  |

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |------------>
  | To:        |
  |------------>

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   |nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com
  |

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |------------>
  | Date:      |
  |------------>

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   |07/07/2010 12:10 PM
  |

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |------------>
  | Subject:   |
  |------------>

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   |[NV-L] Discovery X subnet
  |

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |------------>
  | Sent by:   |
  |------------>

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   |nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
  |

  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





  Hello list!

  I have a Netview 7.1.5 fp0004 installed on a Linux box and something's
  been
  bothering me for quite a while:
  Most of the device's IPs are in a 10.0.0.0 network, and sometimes when a
  new device is discovered (by means of adding it to the netmon.seed file)
  it
  is added to a IP network symbol named 10. Is there any way to control
  this?
  I mean when the IP is 10.2.3.3 shouldn't Netview add it to the 10.2.3
  network?

  Best regards to all!
  Marcelo Zacchi
   _______________________________________________
  NV-L mailing list
  NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
  Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
  http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
  internal IBM'ers only)




  _______________________________________________
  NV-L mailing list
  NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
  Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
  http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
  internal IBM'ers only)
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)




_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)

This email, including attachments, may contain confidential information. If you 
have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete it 
immediately. Views expressed by the sender may not be those of Oxfordshire 
County Council. Council emails are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 
2000. http://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/emaildisclaimer

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web