nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [NV-L] Synchronization process

To: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Synchronization process
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:52:08 -0400
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:53:12 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <8117F2DD123AED4A955462086CDF2B3808F955DCFA@ESCE-EVS-01.doe.local>
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8117F2DD123AED4A955462086CDF2B3808F955DCFA@ESCE-EVS-01.doe.local>
Reply-to: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

That sounds about right. It is the synchronization between the object database and the map that you have opened. It has update not only the status of every object in the map, but any changes that have taken place, ie discovery, connections, etc. It is probably most dependant on memory.  So no, it is not about communication with the devices.  My memory may be failing me, since I've been away from it for a while, but I believe it takes the longest after an ovtopovox.

If you are using the netviewd with a r/w map, and users access it with the web client, then the netviewd guy has the chance to keep its map up to date continuously and you don't see this.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager



From: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov>
To: "'nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Date: 08/16/2010 12:22 PM
Subject: [NV-L] Synchronization process
Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com





Can anyone shed light on the parameters of the "synchronizing" process that takes place periodically as maps are manipulated.  I don't see much processor time being used (using the TOP command) but it is taking a long time to complete whenever it runs. By a long time I mean over an hour on a network with about 40K elements.

Specifically I would like to know if it involves actual communications with the devices on the network.  

Bill Evans
Senior Tivoli NetView Support Analyst
Energy Enterprise Solutions (EES)
Support to OCIO HQ DOE IM-621.5
e-mail: bill.evans@hq.doe.gov
301-903-0057 office
570-852-9549 cell
570-639-5691 home



_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only)


_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web