nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

AW: NetView Databases

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: AW: NetView Databases
From: ADAMCZYK Herbert <herbert.adamczyk@CAIT.CO.AT>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:52:53 +0100
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Hi Art,

We are not convinced to use a RDB for the topology database. The main reason
is, that you can't currently put the object and the map databases to a RDB:
so where is the benefit at the moment ?
On the other hand it is very useful to put all traps into the database (We
provide trap online-reports (via web) and batch-reports).
What we prefer to do is to wait for a database re-design from tivoli.

Herbert Adamczyk
iT-AUSTRIA


> ----------
> Von:  Art DeBuigny[SMTP:debuignynospam@NOSPAMDALLAS.NOSPAMNET]
> Gesendet:     Freitag, 22. Januar 1999 23:53
> Betreff:      NetView Databases
>
> Hi all;
>
> I was wanting to get some ideas as to how other folks are handling the
> databases within NetView on AIX.  We are currently using the standard
> flat file format, but are considering enacting a sybase or oracle
> database solution as our database is quite large, and will only get
> larger as time flies by.
>
> I wanted to know what kind of performance issues would be involved with
> converting to a third party database solution.  Would we take a hit, or
> gain ground.  Are there any challenges that I need to know about?
> Should the database be run on a seperate server, or can (should) it run
> on the same box as NetView.
>
> Also, how many objects are your databases running out there?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Art DeBuigny
> Bank of America Network Solutions
> art.debuigny@nationsbank.com
> debuigny@dallas.net
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: NetView Databases, ADAMCZYK Herbert <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web