[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Objects appearing on the Map...

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: New Objects appearing on the Map...
From: benvain <benvain@BSD.TM.FR>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 18:56:06 -0400
Organization: Banque Scalbert Dupont
Reply-to: benvain@bsd.tm.fr
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
More informations about automatic layout in Dynatext books:
TME10 NetView Administrator's Guide
   Chapter 4. Customizing the Graphical Interface
      Arranging Symbols
         Setting Automatic Layout


     Bernard Envain
CIC-Banque Scalbert-Dupont
    Dpt Informatique
Ph. : +33 3 20 12 60 47
Fax : +33 3 20 12 60 80

Rob Rinear wrote:
> I'm not familiar with version 4, but with v5, I've never seen this problem.
> Any new Routers and IP subnets will remain on the IP Internet Map as they
> are supposed to, but all other objects will be placed on the proper submap.
> If you are expecting that Netview will also place routers and IP subnets
> into locations you've created, it will not do that - you have to cut & paste
> them  where you want them.  (Basically, the IP Internet IS the proper submap
> for routers and subnets in Netview's "mind").
> Automatic layout should have nothing to do with this.  Netview should always
> place the object on the proper submap regardless of the automatic layout
> settings.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
> [mailto:NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU]On Behalf Of Gord Michaels
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 11:20 AM
> Subject: New Objects appearing on the Map...
> Hello All.
> In Netview V4.1, when a new object is added to the seedfile, the object
> appears on the IP Internet Map (topmost layer of the IP Internet map). It
> will not automatically be placed into it's correct submap, Instead I have to
> dig down submap by submap and move it there manually.
> Does Netview V5.1 solve this and what is the exact relationship between
> automatic layout being turned off (so I can customize the map) and new
> objects not being placed in their correct submap? I have found no
> difference, has anyone else??
> Any info appreciated.
> Gord.
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web