James,
It seemed to work fine for a single selection (as you describe below),
where the problem comes in... is if you try to AND it with something
else.
Question: Did you try this to, or just the single condition?
Thanks.
Gary Boyles
-----Original Message-----
From: James Shanks [mailto:James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 2:53 PM
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
Subject: Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.
I don't know what to tell you guys. I have 5.1.1 installed and I did just
what Gary did and it works only too well for me.
I selected "IP Properties" and "Using Wildcards", clicked the IP Address
radio button, and used the Tivoli subnet 146.84.*.*, and then hit APPLY.
I got a huge number of hits.
James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
Xu He <xuhe@YAHOO.COM> on 06/10/99 04:49:59 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.
I tried this a while back, I don't think it worked for
me either. Because an IP address is normally
associated with a NIC, and which is a subcomponent of
a Node. So if you AND the result of the IP Address
search with isNode, it won't work. Right now, I don't
know of any way to create a smartset of Nodes using
strictly IP Addresses.
May be James and Leslie can enlighten us on how this
can be done, or just tell us that it's impossible.
--- "Boyles, Gary P" <gary.p.boyles@INTEL.COM> wrote:
> To anyone,
> I ws wondering if anyone on NT has gotten this kind
> of smartset example
> to work (mine doesn't seem to cut it).
>
> 1) I'm trying to create a smartset using:
> * "IP Properties" (Using Wildcards) "IP
> Address"
> * I put in the address such as 132.233.*
>
> 2) I do an "Add To Advanced", and then try to AND
> this with
> * "Other Properties" (Type) "Node".
>
> The result is... I never get anything in my
> smartset, even though
> I have many nodes in the address-range, and it
> doesn't find any of them.
>
> BTW -- I've tried using "132.233.*.*", and
> "132.233*, and "132.233.*".
>
> Same results.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gary Boyles
>
===
Xu He
Consulting Services Engineer
Network Solutions, Inc
http://www.netsol.com/consulting
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|