Wolfgang, for what it is worth, we got the exact same text in the
NVF511_ALIDB_after.error file, after we upgraded. There were no indications
of errors, and we've been running succesfully for a couple of months now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Petr [mailto:petr@DATASYS.CZ]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 1999 8:28 AM
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
Subject: Re: NVF511_ALIDB_after.error
Hello, Wolfgang;
I am sorry - the customer does not have those files in the /tmp directory
any longer and I
cannot recall whether there were both of them or just one.
However, the file that you enclosed in your posting did not indicate any
error regarding
the Tivoli database. What about /tmp/update.log? Does it contain SEV_, ERROR
or WARNING?
If not, the install finished successfully.
HTH,
Best regards,
Vladimir.
Wolfgang Hahn wrote:
>
> Vladimir,
> did you also get the /tmp/NVF511_ALIDB_after.error file or did you get
> the
> /tmp/NVF511_ALIDB_after.debug file when you did the same in the same
> environment?
>
> Best Regards, Wolfgang
>
> Vladimir Petr <petr@DATASYS.CZ> on 30.06.99 20:11:19
>
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> cc: (bcc: Wolfgang Hahn/Germany/IBM)
> Subject: Re: NVF511_ALIDB_after.error
>
> Ah, if only I read more carefully! I do not see any error there and the
> exit code
> confirms success so you may try to continue. When I did the same in the
> exactly same
> environment I unfortunately did not notice this but nevertheless was
> successful.
> Good luck!
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir.
>
> Wolfgang Hahn wrote:
>
> > The installation of the TME10 Netview Framework 5.1 to 5.1.1 Patch
> > generates a NVF511_ALIDB_after.error file in the /tmp directory. I
> would
> > have expected to find a NVF511_ALIDB_after.debug file. There was no
> > other
> > error reported during the installation; the exit code is 0. Is this
> a
> > known problem? Can I continue with the TME10 Netview Server V5.1.1
> > Patch
> > installation without hesitation that this might result in follow-on
> > errors?
> > We are running AIX 4.2.1 (4210-04 Level), Framework 3.6.1 and
> Netview
> > 5.1
> >
> > + + wlookup NameRegistry
> > NameRegistry=1296118488.1.26
> > + export NameRegistry
> > + TNR=1296118488.1.26
> > + export TNR
> > + + wlookup Library
> > Library=1296118488.1.14#TMF_SysAdmin::Library#
> > + export Library
> > + CLO=1296118488.1.14#TMF_SysAdmin::Library#
> > + export CLO
> > + [ -z ]
> > + + wlookup InterfaceRepository
> > InterfaceRepository=1296118488.1.4
> > + export InterfaceRepository
> > + idlattr -s -t 1296118488.1.4 replace_mode boolean TRUE
> > + initpres NetViewServer -pres-name -put dialog d_2_2
> > TMF/NETVIEW/d_2_2.d
> > dialog d_2_5 TMF/NETVIEW/d_2_5.d dialog d_3_2_6 TMF/NETVIEW/d_3_2_6.d
> > dialog d_4_10 TMF/NETVIEW/d_4_10.d dialog d_4_11_3
> > TMF/NETVIEW/d_4_11_3.d
> > dialog d_5_5_3 TMF/NETVIEW/d_5_5_3.d
> > + set -e
> > + initpres NetViewClient -pres-name -put dialog d_200_1
> > TMF/NETVIEW/d_200_1.d dialog d_400_1 TMF/NETVIEW/d_400_1.d dialog
> > d_400_3
> > TMF/NETVIEW/d_400_3.d dialog d_500_5_2 TMF/NETVIEW/d_500_5_2.d dialog
> > d_500_5_3 TMF/NETVIEW/d_500_5_3.d
> > + set -e
> > + set +e
> > + xargs rm -f
> > + 0< /tmp/sh22208.1
> > + xargs rmdir
> > + 0< /tmp/sh22208.2
> > + exit 0
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Wolfgang Hahn, IBM Entwicklung GmbH
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> ---
> The eagle never lost so much time, as when he submitted to learn
> of the crow. [W.B.]
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
The eagle never lost so much time, as when he submitted to learn
of the crow. [W.B.]
|