As you say, I guess solution 1 is the best ... Nevertheless I'd like to
investigate more toward point 2 : server A would be having flat files and
exporting to a RDBMS (if it is possible) that would be used by ServerB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederic Mottiat [SMTP:frederic_mottiat@BE.IBM.COM]
> Sent: lundi 6 décembre 1999 16:58
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> Subject: Re: Flat file DB --> RDBMS
>
>
>
> Alain,
>
> Regarding your options :
> 1) Not supported by the lab - from what I've heard or read -, although
> this is
> generaly working quite good - from the point that both NetView servers are
> in
> the same subnet, that you don't forget to use reset_ci and mapadmin
> commands
> 2) I never tried this personnaly, nor read references to that kind of
> config
> anywhere. Anybody tried this ? Although, the question is : the topology DB
> is in
> your RDBMS or exported from server A to the RDBMS, to be used by server B
> - how
> do you maintain adequacy with the object databases on both NetView server.
> Even
> if this could work, I guess it will be more difficult to handle than
> solution 1.
> 3) forget it.
>
> Where do you see reporting facilities in TIPN ? The only one I know about
> are
> for generating HTML reports about your Tivoli Managed Nodes, etc
>
> Frederic Mottiat - IBM Global Services (PSS-SMNS)
> Tivoli Implementation & Services
> Email : frederic_mottiat@be.ibm.com
> Tel : 02/225 34 08 Gsm : +32 (0)75 388 773
>
>
> "MENEZES, ALAIN" <alain.menezes@FORTISBANK.COM> on 06/12/99 16:49:25
>
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView
> <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> cc: (bcc: Frederic Mottiat/Belgium/IBM)
> Subject: Re: Flat file DB --> RDBMS
>
>
> << File: ATT10304.txt >>
|