I agree. If you must run them on the same box we are talking about at least
a Gig of memory and two fast CPU's. I would also use more than one disk e.g.
NT on one disk, paging file on another, NetView on a third and CW2000 on a
fourth.
BR. Michael.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edvyn.Lek@bankofamerica.com [mailto:Edvyn.Lek@bankofamerica.com]
Sent: 18. oktober 2000 23:27
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one NT?
This is a bad idea unless this network has less than 100 devices. We know
netmon is cpu intensive, so is the syslog processing among other functions
in
cw2k. If on different servers it is a better consideration, never on the
same
server unless it is a small network. The NT servers much have at least
double
the minimum requirments stated in the install docs.
"Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM" <lclark@us.ibm.com> on 10/18/2000 01:25:15 PM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
To: NV-L@tkg.com
cc:
Subject: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one NT?
Has anyone tried this arrangement? Anything I should watch out
for, other than performance constraints? NT is not my best subject,
so I would appreciate any warnings you can think of. Thanks
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|