We have Netview 6.0.1 and Optivity NMS 9 installed on one AIX box (besides
CiscoWorks2000). We have been living with Optivity since Netview 4 and
Optivity 6. In my opinion Optivity NMS brings a lot of functionality from
which you should choose what you really need. In our case (we have a lot of
Nortel hardware like ARN, ASN, BN, Passport 6000, Centillion, Baystack and
Accelar) we have turned down a couple of functions that are redundant to
Netview or not usable in our environment:
- SuperPing: Because of zero acceptance for Optivity NMS health tools our
techs prefer Netview to observe IP status of components.
- Trap Correlation, Trap Server, etc.: Netview does it better
- "Layer 2"-Tools: hardly used because of our heterogenous Nortel/Cisco
environment.
What we use:
- Expanded View
- Pick out traps from Optivity and configure them in Netview
What we have ever been missing in Optivity:
- quick device support: Was promised for Optivity 9, but...
- Ability to manage ALL Nortel components: We are still forced to install
several releases of Site Manager and to use another platform for the
Passport 6000 and 4430 series. Besides, there is no equivalent to
SpeedView/NT (to configure ATM devices) on UNIX
And, of course, compared to Ciscoworks 2000 or Transcend that thing is very
slow and if you don't customize it your AIX box has a lot to handle.
Actually we have found a piece of FREE software called "Optivity Switch
Manager 1.0" (look at Nortel's website). It shows Layer2 topology for
Accelar/Baystack450 networks (no ATM). From within you could launch "Device
Manager".
If you have a homogenous Nortel environment you could consider using
Optivity 9 even without integration in a management platform. Optivity works
fine on Unix and NT (of course, it depends on your network size). The usage
of Netview AND Optivity costs a couple of decisions what to use from where.
If you have, e.g., only Routers, Accelars and Baystack 450 in your network
you could consider not to choose Optivity NMS at all. The interoperability
of Netview and Optivity stays the same, either if they reside on the same
box or not.
Migration from Netview 5 to 6:
- choose 6.0.1, not 6.0, because of some important fixes!
- use DNS instead of /etc/hosts if you have a large number of node names to
manage
- if you don't want to use communitynames.conf move it away form the conf
directory. else it will cause a lot of unnecessary entries in the
ovsnmp.conf with a (hardcoded) community "public".
As far as I know where have been no changes from 5 to 6 that would influence
the integration of Optivity.
Hope that helps
Richard Fitzinger
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ronnie.ross@springs.com [mailto:ronnie.ross@springs.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. November 2000 17:07
An: IBM NetView Discussion
Betreff: Re: [NV-L] Netview Upgrade Questions
The other thing is Optivity 9.1 is still a dog. Optivity 9.x is written in
Java. Just to bring up a front panel view of a hub/switch is painful. It
is so slow all our Engineers hate to use any of the Optivity apps. When it
was 8.x, we used them all of time. Nortel says there is a major version
comming sometime next year with speed being the major issue.
Ronnie Ross
Network Engineer
ronnie.ross@S
PRINGS.COM To: IBM NetView Discussion
<nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: cc:
owner-nv-l@tk Subject: Re: [NV-L] Netview
Upgrade Questions
g.com
11/01/00
10:52 AM
Please
respond to
IBM NetView
Discussion
We run NetView V6 AIX (working on getting V6.01) with Optivity 9.1 AIX. It
installed without any problems and integrated correctly into NetView (all
icons are right). We used web ports 8080 for NetView and 8090 for
Optivity. This is working OK. The only problem we found in Optivity is
the superping daemon. It seemed to ping stuff that was down EXTREMLY fast.
Thousands of packets. So we just stop the daemon and now it works OK.
No experience with NT stuff.
Ronnie Ross
Network Engineer
"Jackie
Hufnail" To: nv-l@tkg.com
<jlh91350@hot cc: jhufnail@hcfa.gov,
dmatter@hcfa.gov
mail.com> Subject: [NV-L] Netview
Upgrade Questions
Sent by:
owner-nv-l@tk
g.com
11/01/00
10:37 AM
Please
respond to
IBM NetView
Discussion
Greetings to all. I am new to this group and to the more modern versions
of
Netview and am looking forward to communicating with people who have
experience implementing NetView on AIX. I have several questions that I
hope may spark some response.
1. Does anyone have experience with connecting and transmitting data
between NetView 6000 V5.0 or V6.0 for AIX and Optivity 9.1 residing on an
NT
or Solaris platform? If so, are there any problems to watch out for when
setting up this connection?
2. Has anyone integrated Optivity 9.1 for AIX on the same AIX box with
NetView 6000 V6.0? Were there any problems? (We tried to put NetView 6000
5.1 and Optivity 8.x on the same AIX/RS6000 box and it was a disaster. -
The
9.1 Optivity is supposed to work with AIX but I haven't found anyone who
has
done it yet.)
3. Has anyone recently upgraded from NetView 5.0 for AIX to 6.0 for AIX?
What problems were encountered?
Thank you all in advance,
Jackie Hufnail
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|