nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Duplicate ip addresses in network.

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: Duplicate ip addresses in network.
From: BAUDOUX BERNARD <bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:08:37 +0100
I agree with Emmanuel, and ask one question : are those addresses assigned
to routers interfaces ?
In that case, I am not sure of whether you can ask netmon to discover only
part of a device : during a poll for config, netmon 'sees' all interfaces of
a router, what happens if an interface is assigned an address defined as
negative entry in the seed file ?

Regards,
Bernard Baudoux
Phone: +32 (0)2/565.24.68
e-mail : bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: DE SCHUTTER EMMANUEL 
> Sent: Friday, 10 November, 2000 08:52
> To:   'IBM NetView Discussion'
> Subject:      RE: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
> 
> I wonder if the way you specified the negative entries is valid. To
> exclude
> both 192.168.10.150 and 192.168.10.151 adresses from the discovery, I
> think
> you must specify this : !192.168.10.150-151 
> 
> Moreover on Netview 5.1.2 (NT), it exists a registry key that netmon uses
> to
> allow/avoid duplicate address :
> (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Tivoli\TME 10 Netview\AllowDupIpNames) but I
> do
> not know if this registry key still exist on Netview 6.0.1(NT)
> 
> Regards,
> E.De Schutter
> Compaq
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Schahfer [mailto:Anne.Schahfer@trw.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 04:04 PM
> To: nv-l@tkg.com
> Subject: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
> 
> 
> The network I work on has been customized with duplicate addresses of
> 192.168.10.150 and 192.168.10.151.  These addresses were assigned to
> a total of eight platforms/hosts (i.e., four have addess of 192.168.10.150
> and
> four have address of 192.168.10.151).  The network architect felt it was
> okay to do this because 192.168.10 is considered a "private network" and
> is not routed over the network.  The platforms with these addresses
> contain
> two
> additional network cards which are unique and which are what I really
> want to monitor.
> 
> I have tried via a seedfile to get netmon to ignore these addresses
> (i.e., !192.168.10.150-192.168.10.151) but netmon still finds the
> addresses...because of the other network addresses in these platforms, I
> think.
> 
> I see in the NetView Diagnsis Guide the  documented solution is to
> "Correct
> the
> problem in your network".  However, it would be more desirable if I could
> just get NetView to ignore the duplicate addresses.  Does anyone know
> another way to get NetView to ignore the duplicate addresses but still
> monitor the
> rest of the platforms?
> 
> Thanks, Anne Schahfer
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web