Don't tell anyone! That is a defect, and occurrs on NT only.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit
DE SCHUTTER EMMANUEL <Emmanuel.DESCHUTTER@fortisbank.com>@tkg.com on
11/10/2000 08:48:00 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
Leslie,
I don't know if you are exactly right about the discovery of a device with
multiple IP addresses.
On my system (Netview V6.0.1 for NT), I configured my seed file to ignore 2
interfaces of a total of 5 interfaces of a device. Then, I launched a new
discovery with the options "Discover with seed file" and "Discover seed
nodes Only".
When the discovery completed, the device showed only 3 interfaces, as
requested (The 2 interfaces defined as negative entries weren't discovered
by netmon). Finally, even after a nmdemandpoll on this device, both
interfaces weren't discovered.
So are you sure that "regardless of the type of device, if you discover one
interface it will discover all of them ?". Maybe the way that netmon works
is platform related (NT/UNIX) ?
E. De Schutter
Compaq
-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM [mailto:lclark@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 01:05 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
Bernard is right. Regardless of the type of device, if you
discover one interface it will discover all of them. At V6, Netview
is pretty good at allowing the duplicate and moving it to the node
on which that interface is UP. It would prefer that the other one is
Administratively Down.
When you discover these nodes, use a seedfile and make sure
to specify the unique addresses.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit
BAUDOUX BERNARD <bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com>@tkg.com on 11/10/2000
03:08:37 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
I agree with Emmanuel, and ask one question : are those addresses assigned
to routers interfaces ?
In that case, I am not sure of whether you can ask netmon to discover only
part of a device : during a poll for config, netmon 'sees' all interfaces
of
a router, what happens if an interface is assigned an address defined as
negative entry in the seed file ?
Regards,
Bernard Baudoux
Phone: +32 (0)2/565.24.68
e-mail : bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DE SCHUTTER EMMANUEL
> Sent: Friday, 10 November, 2000 08:52
> To: 'IBM NetView Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
>
> I wonder if the way you specified the negative entries is valid. To
> exclude
> both 192.168.10.150 and 192.168.10.151 adresses from the discovery, I
> think
> you must specify this : !192.168.10.150-151
>
> Moreover on Netview 5.1.2 (NT), it exists a registry key that netmon uses
> to
> allow/avoid duplicate address :
> (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Tivoli\TME 10 Netview\AllowDupIpNames) but I
> do
> not know if this registry key still exist on Netview 6.0.1(NT)
>
> Regards,
> E.De Schutter
> Compaq
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Schahfer [mailto:Anne.Schahfer@trw.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 04:04 PM
> To: nv-l@tkg.com
> Subject: [NV-L] Duplicate ip addresses in network.
>
>
> The network I work on has been customized with duplicate addresses of
> 192.168.10.150 and 192.168.10.151. These addresses were assigned to
> a total of eight platforms/hosts (i.e., four have addess of
192.168.10.150
> and
> four have address of 192.168.10.151). The network architect felt it was
> okay to do this because 192.168.10 is considered a "private network" and
> is not routed over the network. The platforms with these addresses
> contain
> two
> additional network cards which are unique and which are what I really
> want to monitor.
>
> I have tried via a seedfile to get netmon to ignore these addresses
> (i.e., !192.168.10.150-192.168.10.151) but netmon still finds the
> addresses...because of the other network addresses in these platforms, I
> think.
>
> I see in the NetView Diagnsis Guide the documented solution is to
> "Correct
> the
> problem in your network". However, it would be more desirable if I could
> just get NetView to ignore the duplicate addresses. Does anyone know
> another way to get NetView to ignore the duplicate addresses but still
> monitor the
> rest of the platforms?
>
> Thanks, Anne Schahfer
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|