no 192.169.1.2 is not the defaultrouter. it is just to
connect the 172.23.50.0 network.
and again, it is forbitten to me to add the route manually!!!
I have to use SNMP over the reachable interface to map the
status of the unreachable interface.!!! This is recommend!!!
Michael
Jeff
Fitzwater To: IBM NetView Discussion
<nv-l@tkg.com>
<jfitz@PRINCE cc:
TON.EDU> Subject: Re: [NV-L] map cares on
ip but ignores
Sent by: snmp
owner-nv-l@tk
g.com
11/16/00
04:33 PM
Please
respond to
IBM NetView
Discussion
If the 192.168.1.2 router is the only router connected to your Netview net
192.168.1.0 then I would make sure that there is a default route defined in
the netview box pointing to 192.168.1.2 so it caqn find the 212.132.50.0
net.
If on unix do the following...
netstat -rn
Look for a route 0.0.0.0 or the word "default" it should be pointing to
the
192.168.1.2 router.
if there is a default but pointing to the wrong place and you want to leave
it in, add a route as follows... (must be root)
route add 212.132.50.0 192.168.1.2 1
This tells Netview how to reach that net which is 1 hop away.
On windows or NT I believe you can use the MSDOS window and the syntax is
simmilar.
Jeff fitzwater
CIT Systems & Networking
Princeton University
michael.hamm@tudor.lu wrote:
> i am running two LANs, connected true 2 routers
> by each other. To connect the routers, I have to
> use the transfer - network 212.132.50.0 (dont ask me why)
>
> so it looks something like this:
>
> NV-BOX (Local Net 1)
> ¦ (192.168.1.1)
> ¦
> ¦
> ¦ (192.168.1.2)
> Router
> ¦ (212.132.50.1)
> ¦
> ¦ (transfer - network)
> ¦
> ¦ (212.132.50.2)
> Router
> ¦ (172.23.20.1)
> ¦
> ¦
> (Local Net 2)
>
> NetView has no chance, to reach the 2 cards 50.1 and 50.2 over IP
> and it is absolutly forbitten to me to set the route localy.
>
> So the MAP applikation of NetView give a red label to the
> interface-symbols.
>
> I enabe SNMP on the router, but the MAP - Applikation was
> not smart enought to check the SNMP-Value of the interfaces
> and indicate them green.
> They are still red, thats sad.
>
> Is there a solution???
> Michael
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|