nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: Dormant Interfaces

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: RE: Dormant Interfaces
From: "Garcia Crespo, Jose Manuel" <jogarcia@endesa.es>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:10:55 +0100
I`m so sorry,I have not describe my box.
I`m running Netview 6.0.1 (upgrade from 5.1) on AIX 4.3.2., for that router
the status is reported by snmp, because for those numbered interfaces I
can`t resolve its addresses.

José Manuel García



> -----Mensaje original-----
> De:   James_Shanks@tivoli.com [SMTP:James_Shanks@tivoli.com]
> Enviado el:   Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:58 PM
> Para: IBM NetView Discussion
> Asunto:       RE: RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> Dialer interfaces should be set to have status reported by SNMP and not by
> ping.  That's why that feature was provided
> If this is a 5.1 issue rather than 6.0.1 then you have to live with them
> as
> "critical" or unmanage them.
> 
> 
> James Shanks
> Team Leader, Level 3 Support
>  Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
> 
> 
> 
> "Peter Anderson" <pETERanderson@westpac.com.au>@tkg.com on 12/20/2000
> 04:19:17 PM
> 
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> 
> Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> 
> 
> To:   "Netview List (E-mail)" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry James, but your wrong (partially :-)
> 
> Extract from  RFC1573b mib:
> 
> "The current operational state of the interface.  The
>         testing(3) state indicates that no operational packets
>         can be passed.  If ifAdminStatus is down(2) then
>         ifOperStatus should be down(2).  If ifAdminStatus is
>         changed to up(1) then ifOperStatus should change to
>         up(1) if the interface is ready to transmit and
>         receive network traffic; it should change to
>         dormant(5) if the interface is waiting for external
>         actions (such as a serial line waiting for an
>         incomming connection); it should remain in the down(2)
>         state if and only if there is a fault that prevents if
>         from going to the up(1) state."
> 
> Therefore AdminStatus UP and OperStatus DORMANT is a normal scenario for a
> dialler connection (ISDN, SLIP, etc).
> You would be right if it were an Ethernet however ...
> 
> I don't think José actually said what it was.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter Anderson
> Senior Communications Analyst
> Westpac Banking Corporation
> Ph:  0011 61 2 99025938
> 
> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Westpac Banking Corporation.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SZEWCZYK, Jack
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:37 AM
> To: ANDERSON, Peter
> Subject: FW: RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:               James_Shanks@tivoli.com
> Sent:               Wednesday, 20 December 2000 13:34
> To:            IBM NetView Discussion
> Cc:
> Subject:            RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:               James_Shanks@tivoli.com
> Sent:               Wednesday, 20 December 2000 13:34
> To:            IBM NetView Discussion
> Cc:
> Subject:            RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> My understanding is that your snmpd agent in the router should not allow a
> state in which the Admin status is UP and the Oper status is dormant.  He
> should set the Admin status to down when you change the Oper status to
> dormant, because you have taken an administrative step to bring down the
> router.  The bug is in the Wellfleet code, not NetView's.
> 
> James Shanks
> Team Leader, Level 3 Support
>  Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
> 
> 
> 
> "Garcia Crespo, Jose Manuel" <jogarcia@endesa.es>@tkg.com on 12/20/2000
> 05:32:01 AM
> 
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> 
> Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> 
> 
> To:   IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> me too
> 
> thanks a lot.
> 
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De:     Leslie Clark [SMTP:lclark@us.ibm.com]
> > Enviado el:  Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:34 AM
> > Para:   IBM NetView Discussion
> > Asunto: RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> >
> > Guys, don't you think it is time someone took this forward as a
> > requirement?  I vote that a customer do it...
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > Leslie A. Clark
> > IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> > Detroit
> >
> >
> > "Peter Anderson" <pETERanderson@westpac.com.au>@tkg.com on 12/19/2000
> > 06:23:54 PM
> >
> > Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> >
> > Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> >
> >
> > To:   "Netview List (E-mail)" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  RE: [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> >
> >
> >
> > If it's the same as I remember, I reported this as a bug, and eventually
> > was
> > told it was a design feature (???).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter Anderson
> > Senior Communications Analyst
> > Westpac Banking Corporation
> > Ph:  0011 61 2 99025938
> >
> >
> > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
> > not necessarily represent those of Westpac Banking Corporation.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:               Garcia Crespo, Jose Manuel
> > Sent:               Tuesday, 19 December 2000 18:35
> > To:            'Nv-L (Correo electrónico)
> > Cc:
> > Subject:            [NV-L] Dormant Interfaces
> >
> > Hi,
> > Interfaces with ifAdminStatus: up and ifOperStatus: dormant are show by
> > Netview as critical, I`m getting router status with snmp because I can
> not
> > do ping to these interfaces. There is a way to change the status of
> these
> > interfaces to something like status User1?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > José Manuel García Crespo
> > @   Herrramientas de Gestión
> > *  Tlf : 91-566-88-00 ext 4046
> > * jogarcia@endesa.es
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web