Yes you can use actions and wpostemsg to forward to TEC. Other people do.
So your overall scheme will work. I cannot speak for the performance.
As for the "Pass-On-Match" information, if you are asking about the Input 2
trap, the "match" criteria, then the answer is generally, "no". The
matching trap is used as a go-nogo filter for the one held in the POM
cache, then it is discarded without a trace. Only the one which was held
initially (Input 1) while waiting for the match is passed along. It is his
variables and other contents which get put into the environment variables
for use in the Action node.
James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
Scott.Bursik@fritolay.com@tkg.com on 01/17/2001 11:16:31 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
To: nv-l@tkg.com
cc:
Subject: [NV-L] Action item in ruleset editor
AIX 4.3.3 NetView 6.0.1
I am using a ruleset to watch 4 smartsets and if a node enters a Smartset
based
on that Smartsets rule the event is forwared to TEC for action (e-mail,
page,
TPM ticket). The problem I have is I want different groups notified for
each of
the 4 Smartsets. I can do some kind of script on the TEC side, but I was
wondering if a "Action" from the ruleset editor for each event flow in the
rule
set for each smartset would be a better idea? That "Action" could run a
wpostemsg so TEC could then send the alerts to different groups. I was
wondering
if anyone has tried this and is there a to capture the trap info from the
rule
"Pass on match" block to use in the "Action" script? Hope this makes sense?
Thanks.
Scott Bursik
Pepsico Business Solutions Group
scott.bursik@fritolay.com
972-334-3757
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|