What else can there be but postemsg and wpostemsg???
Unless something is happening we don't know about it has
to be one of the two and the TEC Adapter should be using
one or the other. If the machine is not an endpoint or
managed node I would suspect it uses postemsg as it
can't get to oserv. I don't know how smart the TEC
Adapter is and if it detects if it should use one or the
other. Then again maybe it does something else
completely.
--
> NetView for UNIX has a built-in TEC adapter in the nvserverd daemon. You
> use a ruleset to forward to TEC. You set this up using SMIT or the
> Configure dialog of the Framework. It is well-documented in the Install
> Guide and the Admin Guide what to do. If you prefer to use wpostemsg you
> can do that to, provided your TMR is connected to the one which has the TEC
> server. The other way does not require that the TMR of the TEC server even
> know yours exists.
>
> James Shanks
> Team Leader, Level 3 Support
> Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
>
>
>
> Montoya Vincent-O10501 <Vincent.Montoya@motorola.com>@tkg.com on 02/20/2001
> 12:24:18 PM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
> To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject: [NV-L] The Forwarding Mechanism (wpostemsg or wasync or what ?)
> to TEC
>
>
>
>
>
> AIX Version 4.3
> NetView Version 6.0
> Seed file with non-snmp and snmp enabled agents. No ranges (wildcards) are
> specified.
> Mid-Level Management is beeing implemented.
>
> What does NetView use to forward events to the TEC?
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
|