To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Unable to discover nodes using SNMP status Was: OIDs Seedf iles and SNMP status polling |
From: | "Cowan, Chris" <Chris.Cowan@2ndwaveinc.com> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:29:48 -0500 |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. Well the reason that I want to use SNMP status rather than pings is that ICMP echos are blocked at a private VLAN boundary, but SNMP isn't. Which brings me to my question. I attempted to SNMP status query 2 Nokia Crypto Clusters (actually it's an HA config with 2 boxes and a 3rd shared address). I can snmpwalk the two systems, but as stated earlier ICMP echos are blocked. For some reason, the two boxes will not discover. I'm not sure if it is because pings are blocked, or that there is a 3rd virtual address. I am about to try tracing netmon and all that, but figured I would look out here and just see if anyone has tips or ideas. Thanks in advance. -----Original Message----- From: James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM [mailto:James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 8:20 AM To: IBM NetView Discussion Subject: Re: [NV-L] OIDs Seedfiles and SNMP status polling Just a question on why you would want to do this. Since the overhead involved to get status via SNMP rather than by ping is so much greater, why would you want to make that the default? Getting status via SNMP is a very new feature in NetView and it should be used sparingly, which probably accounts more than anything else for why you cannot simply set things up as you suggest. I think product management would want to see a full-blown performance analysis before they'd let such a feature out the door. But that is just my opinion here. If you think this should be a feature, then my suggestion is that you call Support and open an enhancement request. James Shanks Team Leader, Level 3 Support Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT danny@UK.IBM.COM@tkg.com on 03/20/2001 08:09:26 AM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: nv-l@tkg.com cc: Subject: [NV-L] OIDs Seedfiles and SNMP status polling Hi All I am attempting to have my cake and eat it, so please don't flame me for presenting an unreasonable request: I have a seedfile that contains IP addresses and IP address. What I would like to do is status poll most of the devices using SNMP. However, if I understand correctly, one must first discover the object and then add the "$" before the IP address or hostname in the seedfile. So I had an idea: how about using OIDs - maybe I can put the following line in my seedfile and run "netmon -y" (it's the OID of a printer) $@oid 1.3.6.1.4.1.2001.1.2.683.6 No such luck. Therefore, the only solution that I can think of is to work through the database to see which objects have been discovered and support SNMP and have the appropriate OID and update the seedfile accordingly (not forgetting the netmon -y afterwards). I'm sure that someone out there has had to deal with the same issue. Wouldn't it be great if there was a flag you could set somewhere that says "If the object supports SNMP, use SNMP to status poll it"? Any ideas anyone? Cheers. Danny Danny Williams Tivoli & AIX Specialist IBM Global Services - Integrated Technology Services mailto:danny@uk.ibm.com Tel: 665520 (01926-465520) -- MOBX: 275520 (07967-275520) _________________________________________________________________________ NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l _________________________________________________________________________ NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l Well the reason that I want to use SNMP status rather than pings is that ICMP echos are blocked at a private VLAN boundary, but SNMP isn't. Which brings me to my question. I attempted to SNMP status query 2 Nokia Crypto Clusters (actually it's an HA config with 2 boxes and a 3rd shared address). I can snmpwalk the two systems, but as stated earlier ICMP echos are blocked. For some reason, the two boxes will not discover. I'm not sure if it is because pings are blocked, or that there is a 3rd virtual address. I am about to try tracing netmon and all that, but figured I would look out here and just see if anyone has tips or ideas. Thanks in advance. -----Original Message-----
Just a question on why you would want to do this.
If you think this should be a feature, then my suggestion is that you call
James Shanks
danny@UK.IBM.COM@tkg.com on 03/20/2001 08:09:26 AM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: nv-l@tkg.com
Hi All I am attempting to have my cake and eat it, so please don't flame me for
I have a seedfile that contains IP addresses and IP address. What I would
So I had an idea: how about using OIDs - maybe I can put the following line
$@oid 1.3.6.1.4.1.2001.1.2.683.6 No such luck. Therefore, the only solution that I can think of is to work through the
I'm sure that someone out there has had to deal with the same issue. Wouldn't it be great if there was a flag you could set somewhere that says
Any ideas anyone? Cheers. Danny Danny Williams
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: How to Forward to TEC without portmapper?, James_Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Tivoli, Gareth_Holl |
Previous by Thread: | How to Forward to TEC without portmapper?, Steve Damron |
Next by Thread: | Re: Unable to discover nodes using SNMP status Was: OIDs Seedf iles and SNMP status polling, Gareth_Holl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web