Very interesting. The Router events are new events provided by
the Router Fault Isolator function. Apparently the RFI is not bound by
the definition of router as used by the rest of Netview. RFI keeps track
of whether there are any router interfaces up on a given subnet so it
can indicate whether a subnet is unreachable. If you think this is a
problem, you might want to call Support and talk it over with them.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit
"McCarter, Bill"
<mccarter_we@nap To: "IBM NetView Discussion
(E-mail)"
theon.com> <nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: cc:
owner-nv-l@tkg.c Subject: [NV-L]RouterDown vs
NodeDown
om
08/30/01 03:48
PM
Please respond
to IBM NetView
Discussion
Hi List,
I have a NT 4.0 server with 2 interfaces. 1 interface has 2 ip
addresses that are UP, and the other interface is unmanaged. It went down
today and I received the following events.......
Thu Aug 30 10:02:26 2001 N Interface HP down.(ip address #1)
Thu Aug 30 10:02:26 2001 N Router marginal.
Thu Aug 30 10:02:38 2001 N Interface HP down.(ip address #2)
Thu Aug 30 10:02:38 2001 N Router Down. (trap #58916971, IBM_NVSNMP_EV)
Why did I get a RouterDown event when isIPRouter = FALSE and isRouter =
FALSE, instead of a NodeDown event?
OBJECT: 83923
FIELD ID FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE
10 Selection Name tgif-4-me
57 SNMPAgent Microsoft Windows
NT
4.0(325)
62 vendor Microsoft(23)
78 IP Status Normal(2)
81 isIPRouter FALSE
117 isNode TRUE
119 isComputer TRUE
120 isConnector FALSE
121 isBridge FALSE
122 isRouter FALSE
123 isHub FALSE
125 isPC TRUE
141 isIP TRUE
157 isSNMPSupported TRUE
202 TopM Interface Count 3
208 TopM Interface List "HP Up
172.16.8.115 255.255.254.0 0x00D0B7DF977F ethernet csmacd "
"HP Up
172.16.8.108 255.255.254.0 0x00D0B7DF977F ethernet csmacd "
"HP
Unmanaged 192.168.63.65 255.255.255.0 0x001083FD08DC ethernet csmacd
"
219 XXMAP Protocol List "IP"
#### C.DTF has been removed from this note on September 03 2001 by Leslie
Clark
|