nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RouterDown vs NodeDown

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: RouterDown vs NodeDown
From: "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:21:36 -0400
Very interesting. The Router events are new events provided by
the Router Fault Isolator function. Apparently the RFI is not bound by
the definition of router as used by the rest of Netview. RFI keeps track
of whether there are any router interfaces up on a given subnet so it
can indicate whether a subnet is unreachable. If you think this is a
problem, you might want to call Support and talk it over with them.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


                                                                                
            
                    "McCarter, Bill"                                            
            
                    <mccarter_we@nap       To:     "IBM NetView Discussion 
(E-mail)"        
                    theon.com>              <nv-l@tkg.com>                      
            
                    Sent by:               cc:                                  
            
                    owner-nv-l@tkg.c       Subject:     [NV-L]RouterDown vs 
NodeDown        
                    om                                                          
            
                                                                                
            
                                                                                
            
                    08/30/01 03:48                                              
            
                    PM                                                          
            
                    Please respond                                              
            
                    to IBM NetView                                              
            
                    Discussion                                                  
            
                                                                                
            
                                                                                
            




Hi List,
            I have a NT 4.0 server with 2 interfaces. 1 interface has 2 ip
addresses that are UP, and the other interface is unmanaged. It went down
today and I received the following events.......

Thu Aug 30 10:02:26 2001 N Interface HP down.(ip address #1)
Thu Aug 30 10:02:26 2001 N Router marginal.
Thu Aug 30 10:02:38 2001 N Interface HP down.(ip address #2)
Thu Aug 30 10:02:38 2001 N Router Down. (trap #58916971, IBM_NVSNMP_EV)

Why did I get a RouterDown event when isIPRouter = FALSE and isRouter =
FALSE, instead of a NodeDown event?

OBJECT: 83923
        FIELD ID        FIELD NAME                      FIELD VALUE
        10              Selection Name                  tgif-4-me

        57              SNMPAgent                       Microsoft Windows
NT
4.0(325)
        62              vendor                          Microsoft(23)
        78              IP Status                       Normal(2)
        81              isIPRouter                      FALSE
        117             isNode                          TRUE
        119             isComputer                      TRUE
        120             isConnector                     FALSE
        121             isBridge                        FALSE
        122             isRouter                        FALSE
        123             isHub                           FALSE
        125             isPC                            TRUE
        141             isIP                            TRUE
        157             isSNMPSupported                 TRUE
        202             TopM Interface Count            3
        208             TopM Interface List             "HP         Up
172.16.8.115    255.255.254.0   0x00D0B7DF977F  ethernet csmacd     "
                                                        "HP         Up
172.16.8.108    255.255.254.0   0x00D0B7DF977F  ethernet csmacd     "
                                                        "HP
Unmanaged  192.168.63.65   255.255.255.0   0x001083FD08DC  ethernet csmacd
"
        219             XXMAP Protocol List             "IP"





#### C.DTF has been removed from this note on September 03 2001 by Leslie
Clark


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: RouterDown vs NodeDown, Leslie Clark <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web