nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Acknowledged trap generated by trapd

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: Acknowledged trap generated by trapd
From: "Davis, Donald" <donald.davis@firstcitizens.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:49:28 -0500
Scott & James,
I checked my ipmap.log. It goes all the way back to December, 2000.
The log is full of NVMAPACKGLOBAL=FALSE records.
There is not a single TRUE record.
I am seeing "netmon-related application: connection and disconnecting from
trapd.
I am also seeing "IP MAP connected to trapd" messages
I am opening a PMR for this (to your attention Scott).


Don

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Donohoo [mailto:sdonohoo@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:48 AM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledged trap generated by trapd


Don,

Other than someone sending the trap manually using the event command or 
acknowledgedUtil (which does it for you), ovw_binary generates these traps 
only if NVMAPGLOBALACK is set. And it looks like ovw generated the traps 
in this case. If they had been sent manually, you would also see 
"netmon-related Application connected to trapd" in the trapd.log. 

Like James said, it only has to be set for one gui's environment. Whether 
or not the variable is set at ovw startup is logged in 
/usr/OV/log/ipmap.log. You might check there to see if it is reported as 
ever having been set at startup. If ipmap.log shows it has never been set 
and you still get these traps, you should call support to have it 
investigated.
 
--
Scott Donohoo
Tivoli NetView for Unix/NT L3




James Shanks/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
11/07/2001 10:25 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion

 
        To:     IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [NV-L] Acknowledged trap generated by trapd

 


Don - 

First let me say I am sorry about your predicament, but beyond that I am 
mystified by what you are saying. 
You are correct that these traps do not come from trapd, despite the "T" 
source character, because there was no existing source for ovw_binary and 
the lead developer said he did not want to create one.  That's where he 
said they do come from -- ovw_binary. 

But your problem description has so many strange aspects that I cannot see 
how they fit together. No one else has reported anything like this (I 
would have been consulted I am sure) so I hardly know where to begin.   I 
don't doubt what you are saying -- I am just so puzzled that I hardly know 
what else to say. 
But is seems to me that someone had to have to global acknowledgement on 
at some point for those traps to have been generated.  It only takes one 
NetView GUI session.  Are you sure no operator sets it?  Do you never get 
these trapd at any other time, except when the operators have gone home? 
But even if it was on, and the operator went home, what I don't understand 
is how a defunct ovw_binary process could generate the callback equivalent 
of an acknowledge event. 

 If Exceed is the culprit, then I don't know hat to tell you to do, since 
this is the kind of screwy behavior which causes us to say that we do not 
support environments where it is used (sorry), since we have no control 
over it and no idea how it works internally.  It doesn't even talk to 
NetView directly but to the X-server on your AIX box (could you need 
maintenance here?), and NetView itself has no knowledge that it is running 
over an emulated session and there is no way for it to tell.  Looks the 
same to us as local or telnet, and our code is the same.   Have you tried 
to reproduce the problem in a controlled way, such as setting up an Exceed 
session and deliberately killing it?  Then you could see if the ovw_binary 
process stays around, or if you can halt the behavior by selectively 
killing what is left.   I have no idea how collmap and dispsub fit in 
here.  You could acknowledge an object from a collec! ! tion, of course, 
but I don't see how collmap could be causing the ACK himself any more than 
how ovw_binary could.   

I also don't understand about trapd choking and dying, or the file $HOME 
system filling up.   Even if hundreds of traps are generated, the only 
thing that should grow would be trapd.log and he rolls over, as you 
indicated, so there should be a maximum size.  And if trapd dies, does it 
core?  Are there error messages in trapd.log?  In nettl?   

So puzzled I am all but speechless 

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group





"Davis, Donald" <donald.davis@firstcitizens.com> 
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com 
11/07/2001 08:41 AM 
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion 
        
        To:        "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com> 
        cc:         
        Subject:        RE: [NV-L] Acknowledged trap generated by trapd 

 


Leslie,
I have searched the archives and cannot find my original post or James
Shanks answer.
I recall that James indicated that the T in the log was bogus. The
developers did not 
want to add a new source character for (I think he said) ipmap.

My problem is not solved nor has it gone away. It seems to occur when
operators using eXceed
kill their eXceed sessions and go home, instead of logging out of NetView
properly.

Usually I see incorrectly parented processes, like collmap and dispsub.
I kill -9 them and all returns to normal, if I catch it before $home file
system is full and
my trapd.log rolls over several times and I lose trap data. If I do not
catch it in time, trapd chokes and dies.
It's all down hill from there... 
I am usually alerted, before catastrophic failure, by Tivoli DM monitors
watching pageouts and file system utilization.

I plan to build a monitor to detect hung ovw (ovw_binary) sessions and 
kill
them.

Best regards,
Don Davis



-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Clark [mailto:lclark@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:27 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledged trap generated by trapd


Don, I thought you posted the final answer to this one, but I
cannot find it. The archives (new interface, still missing recent
data) also seem to have nothing for those few days. Can you
repeat the answer, or did it mysteriously stop?

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit





                   "O'Neill,

                   Dermott"             To:     "'IBM NetView Discussion'"

                   <ONeillD@aetna        <nv-l@tkg.com>

                   .com>                cc:
"'donald.davis@firstcitizens.com'" 
                   Sent by:              <donald.davis@firstcitizens.com>

                   owner-nv-l@tkg       Subject:     RE: [NV-L]
Acknowledged trap 
                   .com                  generated by trapd





                   10/02/01 03:00

                   PM

                   Please respond

                   to IBM NetView

                   Discussion








Hey Don,

I remember the man page for trapd.conf has something about the "status"
field:
"status A single character indicating the status that is to be assigned
to an object when it generates the defined trap:
0 Defaults 
1 Unknown
2 Up
3 Marginal
4 Down
5 Unmanaged
6 Acknowledge
7 User1
8 User2"

It looks like a trap that has the status field set to "6" _might_ cause
trapd to generate an "Acknowledged" message - just a guess though....

You can try the following command string to see if there are any status
"6"'s in your trapd file:
awk ' NF >= 7 && $2 ~ /{/  { if ( $7 == "6" ) print $0}'
/usr/OV/conf/C/trapd.conf

Good Luck,
--Dermott


-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Clark [mailto:lclark@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:48 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Acknowledged trap generated by trapd


I have not seen it.  Could there be a ruleset running that
is acknowledging automatically, but something else
(like RFI) is making them green again very fast? Of
course that would indicate that you actually implemented
something and forgot about it....:) Do tell us what it
turns out to be!

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit





                   "Davis, Donald"

                   <donald.davis@firstcit       To:     "IBM NetView
Discussion (E-mail)"
                   izens.com>                    <nv-l@tkg.com>

                   Sent by:                     cc:

                   owner-nv-l@tkg.com           Subject:     [NV-L]
Acknowledged trap
                                                 generated by trapd



                   10/01/01 12:40 PM

                   Please respond to IBM

                   NetView Discussion








NetView 6.0.2  AIX 4.3.3

Has anyone else seen these trap messages in trapd.log?
Why is trapd generating them?
I have NO acknowledged symbols in my map.....
Global Acknowledgement option is OFF
Could it be that something is executing  /usr/OV/bin/acknowledgeUtil ???

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 819
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 977
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 979
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 1012
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 1996
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 2261
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 2263
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 2717
1001952434 7  Mon Oct 01 12:07:14 2001 dcnc.tivoli.aaa.com T default:
Acknowledged 2718


=======================
Donald Davis
First Citizens Bank
Systems Engineer Consultant
Enterprise Management
100 East Tryon Road
Raleigh, NC.  27603-3526
919-716-8448


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
and
are intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivering the electronic mail to the intended recipient, be advised
that you have received this electronic mail in error and that any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this electronic mail is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender by return mail.

============================================================================

==


_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l



_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l



_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l




_________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web