To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Missing object |
From: | "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:24:39 -0600 |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. Just to expand a bit more... My belief has been, that the delete of the object will happen SOMETIME in the future and I was just not waiting long enough (days weeks years?) I always figured I was in this boat because it was taking a good deal of time to remove the objects (i.e the node goes away but the interfaces don't immediately go away). I have also seen this problem when I have seen a node deleted and a interface deleted trap after removing the object using Edit | Delete | From all submaps. Maybe this is something that needs to be traced/dumped/logged with support. [|] -----Original Message----- From: Davis, Donald [mailto:donald.davis@firstcitizens.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:43 AM To: 'IBM NetView Discussion' Subject: RE: [NV-L] Missing object Brad, I'm not sure how you got that server in the state it was in. It's very common and (too) easy to do. Perhaps you cut from all submaps instead of deleting.... who knows :) In any case, the SmartSet trick will find it, if it exists in the Object Database and allow you to delete it. Locate will not find it if it does not exist in the Map Database. ovtopofix -r , and as Scott mentioned, ovwdbdmap -d are UNSUPPORTED options that could also be used to purge the object from the topology and object databases respectively. I have used ovtopofix -r successfully for years. I avoid any incantation of ovwdbdmap. Syntax is: ovtopofix -r [Selection Name | object# ] ovwdbdmap -d [Selection Name | object# ] Avoid both of these if the SmartSet trick works for you. Don Davis -----Original Message----- From: BCP@mead.com [mailto:BCP@mead.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM To: IBM NetView Discussion Subject: RE: [NV-L] Missing object That did the trick! I am still somewhat confused as to why that worked. I created a smartset for that IP address. When I clicked "OK" Netview returned that there were no objects with that IP address would I like to create the smartset anyway. I answered yes, went into that smartset and there was the server I was looking for. I deleted it and Netview rediscovered it. I guess my question is, how did the Smartset find it? Brad Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com> cc: Subject: RE: [NV-L] Missing object Here's a trick that I use. Create a SmartSet specifically for that object. Then open the SmartSet and delete it. I have used this at sites where stopping netmon and running ovtopofix was not an option without a maintenance window. Don Davis -----Original Message----- From: BCP@mead.com [mailto:BCP@mead.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:52 AM To: IBM NetView Discussion Subject: [NV-L] Missing object Netview 7.1 for NT I have an object that I can not find on my map and I can not force Netview to discover it ( I put it in the seedfile ). If I run "ovtopodump hostname" I see an entry for that object. How do I remove this object from the database so Netview can rediscover it or how do I force it to show up on the map? Thanks in advance for your help! Brad ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the electronic mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this electronic mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return mail. ============================================================================ == Just
to expand a bit more...
My
belief has been, that the delete of the object will happen SOMETIME in the
future and I was just not waiting long enough (days weeks years?) I always
figured I was in this boat because it was taking a good deal of time to remove
the objects (i.e the node goes away but the interfaces don't immediately go
away). I have also seen this problem when I have seen a node deleted and a
interface deleted trap after removing the object using Edit | Delete | From all
submaps.
Maybe
this is something that needs to be traced/dumped/logged with
support.
[|] -----Original
Message-----
From: Davis, Donald [mailto:donald.davis@firstcitizens.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:43 AM To: 'IBM NetView Discussion' Subject: RE: [NV-L] Missing object
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Missing object, Davis, Donald |
---|---|
Next by Date: | re: A Better Mousetrap? - nvdbformat, Westphal, Raymond |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Missing object, Davis, Donald |
Next by Thread: | Réf. : Re: Missing object, bducharme |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web