Ray,
I have a very similar environment setup with Cisco routers and very large
Frame Relay network. I just configured the routers with the IP address of
the netview server and enabled frame-relay traps. The router will use
whatever interface it has as its primary route back to the server. In my
situation I have a single serial interface with two PVCs, each with a
different CIR. We are using OSPF and weight the higher CIR PVC so that it
is the primary leg. It works like a charm. Be sure to load the
frame-relay mib and format your traps. BTW we are monitoring the router
using loopback addresses as well (lo0). Our frame is IP unnumbered.
-Don
Don Turrentine
AmSouth Bank
"Westphal,
Raymond" To: "NV List (E-mail)"
<nv-l@tkg.com>
<RWestphal@er cc:
ac.com> Subject: [NV-L] snmp-server
trap-source loopback0
Sent by:
owner-nv-l@tk
g.com
12/20/01
09:51 AM
Please
respond to
IBM NetView
Discussion
Hello Everyone.
NV 6.0.2 for Unix on AIX 4.3.3.10
I know in the past there have been discussions about setting the
trap-source
on the routers. I could not locate the messages in the Archives.
I have frame relay routers that will soon be converted to new pvcs. There
will be a primary and secondary pvc to each router. If we do not set the
trap-source at all will the trap be sent or forwarded on the working serial
interface if the primary pvc goes down?
We want to avoid a lot of DNS work by adding all the loopback addresses.
And
we also want to avoid configuring all the routers.
Can someone please send the arguments for setting the trap-source, please?
Thanks very much.
Happy Holidays
Ray Westphal
Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|