nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover

To: <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:43:11 -0500
So do I understand that one of the reasons to back up the database is to hang 
on to the unmanaged status? I guess that makes some sense.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hochstetler [mailto:shochste@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:57 PM
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Netview Redundancy / Failover



Scott,

Your process is not wrong, if that is what is right for you.   If you have
automated your management (NetView opens trouble tickets automatically)
then there is less reliance on maps that are green.   If you manage via
maps, then you want acknowledgements, manage/unmanage actions to migrate to
your backup on a regular basis.

If you don't have the requirement to administer one map, then your way is
perfectly ok.    The right process is driven by your requirements, not what
the product can/cannot do.

Kind regards,
Stephen Hochstetler              shochste@us.ibm.com
International Technical Support Organization  - Austin
Office - 512-436-8564                      FAX - 512-436-9326

ITSO redbooks at  http://www.redbooks.ibm.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web