[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?
From: "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:25:16 -0500
Yes, I believe it should, at least in passing. Possible there is a Router
that follows it. Possibly it is Log Only? Or possibly that interface is
managed somewhere in some other map? Try running ovmapcount -a
to see if there is a discrepancy in the number of maps the things are
managed in.  I find Router Marginal to be ambiguous so I don't use it
in rulesets, generally.


Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking

                      "James Brunke"                                            
                      <jbrunke@ctsgi.co        To:       
                      m>                       cc:                              
                                               Subject:  [nv-l] RFI Router 
                      11/04/2002 10:31                                          

Netview V7.1.2 on Windows 2K.

I have downstream routers with inactive interfaces I have unmanaged in
Netview.  When a primary upstream router goes down, RFI does it's job
and reports the downstream routers Unreachable and the upstream router
either marginal or down.  But when the upstream router comes back up,
Netview is reporting the downstream routers as Router marginal.  Since
all of the managed interfaces are up, shouldn't it be reporting Router

Is this a bug?

Thanks, Jim

James Brunke
Crystal Technology Solutions Group
Email: jbrunke@ctsgi.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web