To: | "'Cossman,Joshua,GLENDALE,GLOBE Center AMS'" <Joshua.Cossman@us.nestle.com>, nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Router Fault Isolation |
From: | "Davis, Donald" <donald.davis@firstcitizens.com> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:53:35 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 16:47:59 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
Joshua,
NetView discovers Router #1 then discovers Router #2 both have the same IP Addresses configured.
I put negative entries in my seed file to prevent discovery of these routers.
I plan to open a PMR for this but it is probably working as designed.
You will see the same thing. Remote routers will turn White, but NOTHING will turn RED.
I would try to fight through the "politics and turf" issues and get the R/O community name of your ROUTERA, even if it is a carrier. Don
-----Original Message-----
If I do not know the SNMP Read Only string for ROUTERA(I'm not permitted to
JOSHUA COSSMAN
> Nestlé Makes the Very Best®
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] unknown trap?, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] discovery problems [resolved], Karl PrinelleElyzium |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Router Fault Isolation, Allison, Jason (JALLISON) |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Router Fault Isolation, Derald Kopren |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web