nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] discovery problems

To: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] discovery problems
From: jason.ctr.alburger@faa.gov
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:25:52 -0500
Cc: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Delivered-to: mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 18:42:12 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com>
Mailing-list: contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm
Scott,

Most of these I tried already.  I was afraid that old interfaces could be a
problem, so I tried  /usr/OV/bin/ovwdbdmap -d <object number>.  I then
pinged the boxes and got the same results.

"ovtopofix -A" deleted everything about the 2 nodes (these object numbers
are diff. now, due to the nodes being deleted and re-added multiple times)

deleting object 2531 (HINT).
deleting object 2526 (HINT).
2 objects removed from ovwdb (2 hints, 0 old hints, 0 still valid)
deleting object 2527 (INCOMPLETE NODE).
deleting object 2532 (INCOMPLETE NODE).
2 node objects removed from ovwdb.

But, again, the same results after pinging to 2 boxes.

Is there anything else to try?

Thanks in advance!



                                                                                
                                                       
                      "Barr, Scott"                                             
                                                       
                      <Scott_Barr@csgsy        To:       Jason CTR 
Alburger/ACT/CNTR/FAA@FAA, <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>                  
                      stems.com>               cc:                              
                                                       
                                               Subject:  RE: [nv-l] discovery 
problems                                                 
                      04/03/2003 11:01                                          
                                                       
                      AM                                                        
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       




Make sure using ovobjprint -s | grep <interface address> that you do not
have old interfaces in the discovery that are preventing the interfaces
from being added properly. You might have to use the unsupported utility
ovwdbdmap to delete the interface objects OR try doing an ovtopofix -A to
clear 'em out.

-----Original Message-----
From: jason.ctr.alburger@faa.gov [mailto:jason.ctr.alburger@faa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:40 AM
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: [nv-l] discovery problems


Hello list,

I am running AIX 4.3.3, Netview 5.1

Onto our one of our sub-networks, I added 2 new boxes (compaq Tru64 V4.0G)
on which I have installed net-snmp.  Everything else on this subnetwork has
been discovered once the subnetwork is managed and the boxes are pinged (or
if I just wait long enough) --- except for these 2 boxes.  I can snmpwalk,
snmpget, snmpset, etc... to these 2 boxes.  When I pinged these 2 boxes,
this was inserted in the object database:

OBJECT: 1014

    FIELD ID    FIELD NAME          FIELD VALUE
    10          Selection Name              "Interface:XXX.XXX.XX.221"
    17          IP Address                      "XXX.XXX.XX.221"


OBJECT: 1015

    FIELD ID    FIELD NAME          FIELD VALUE
    10          Selection Name           "box1"
    11          IP Hostname                 "box1"

OBJECT: 1016

    FIELD ID    FIELD NAME          FIELD VALUE
    10          Selection Name              "Interface:XXX.XXX.XX.222"
    17          IP Address                      "XXX.XXX.XX.222"


OBJECT: 1017

    FIELD ID    FIELD NAME          FIELD VALUE
    10          Selection Name           "box2"
    11          IP Hostname                 "box2"

box1's IP is XXX.XXX.XX.221 and box2's IP is XXX.XXX.XX.222.   This shows
me that Netview knows about these 2 boxes, but is not managing them.  Can
anybody tell me why these 2 nodes might not be managed by Netview?

Thanks in advance.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web