To: | "'Barr, Scott'" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>, "Lemire, Mark" <mlemire@jhancock.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Netview SNMP/Discovery Issue |
From: | "Lemire, Mark" <mlemire@jhancock.com> |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 06:22:23 -0400 |
Cc: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com, "Kenney, Jack" <jkenney@jhancock.com>, "Hughes, Tom P." <thughes@jhancock.com> |
Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 11:29:27 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
Hi
Scott -- I think you nailed the issue with that one.
Further experimenting here shows that -- at least with
Solairs -- Netview will only keep an object on the map if two conditions are met
at discovery: (1) the object responds to an snmpget with valid mib-2 data, or
(2) the snmp query times out. Otherwise Netview will either not add
the object to the map (not sure if it creates a database stub or not), or -- if
the object is manually added to the map -- Netview will simply delete it at the
next polling cycle.
The
solaris servers which are problematic have a third condition: the snmp
query does *not* time out, but neither is any mib-2 data returned
-- rather only a small amount of proprietary mib data. This seems to
be a clear violation of snmp standards and we consider it to be a separate
problem.
The
only way around it we have found is to add an entry to the Netview SNMP
configuration table for the object, enabling the "use proxy" checkbox, and
specifying any device which will generate an SNMP timeout. Netview then
seems to add the object process ICMP polling against it
properly.
We are
in the process of adding scripts which will manage the SNMP
configuration table for problematic devices, but are concerned that if a large
number are set up to continuously receive SNMP timeouts, if this will have a
significant performance impact or not. In the meantime -- we are doing
what we can to migrate to a supported release. Anyone know if v7.1.3
behaves in a similar way?
Thanks!
Mark
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com *NOTE* This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] status cascade linux, Karl Prinelle |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] loading mibs through web console and trapd.conf is not getting up dated, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Netview SNMP/Discovery Issue, Barr, Scott |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Netview SNMP/Discovery Issue, Barr, Scott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web