| To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [nv-l] bandwidth utilization calculations.. |
| From: | "John M Gatrell" <John.Gatrell@uk.ibm.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:29:25 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 03 Jul 2003 16:35:08 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
|
Adding the in and out bytes together is suitable for a half-duplex connection. I just normally go out of my way to get full-duplex connections. Are you polling the device nearest your NMS, or are your polls competing with the traffic to the TSM server? If you poll the TSM server across a link which is saturated with backup traffic, then I would expect some skew on the figures. John Gatrell, B.A. Physics, CCNA RMSC - IBM UK's Remote Managed Services Centre Tel: 01932-81-4732 Internal 814732 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] bandwidth utilization calculations.., Brian Backer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Secure shell (ssh) for traps, John Bruer |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] bandwidth utilization calculations.., Brian Backer |
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Erik J Dursik/Corporate/Mead is out of the office., Erik J Dursik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web