To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Cat6509 link down/up trap |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:36:21 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:52:31 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com |
You are laboring under a misconception. Whether you configure trapd.conf for these traps or not, has NOTHING to do with whether they arrive in NetView. If you don't see them, then the switches aren't sending them, or they are being sent to the wrong address.. When they aren't configured you still get the trap only it says "No FMT Found" in front of it. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Yes, they all have most common traps enabled. Again I want to make sure that Netview's trapd.conf is correct before blaming the switches' configuration. Catalina, here is the configuration of one of the switches. According to Cisco documentation (see below) the command snmp-server enable traps snmp should enable authentication failure, warmStart, linkUp, and linkDown traps, but I only see authentication and warmstart traps getting configure. I might have to call Cisco on this..... >From Cisco Information page: The following example sends the RFC 1157 authentication failure, warmStart, linkUp, and linkDown SNMP traps to address 172.30.2.160: snmp-server enable traps snmp snmp-server host 172.30.2.160 public snmp My switch snmp confifuration... snmp-server community xxxxxx RW 1 snmp-server community xxxxxx RO 1 snmp-server trap-source Loopback0 snmp-server location xxx snmp-server contact xxxxxxxxxx snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication warmstart (note no linkdown/up traps) snmp-server enable traps chassis snmp-server enable traps module snmp-server enable traps casa snmp-server enable traps vtp snmp-server enable traps slb snmp-server enable traps hsrp snmp-server enable traps config snmp-server enable traps entity snmp-server enable traps bgp snmp-server enable traps rsvp snmp-server enable traps frame-relay snmp-server enable traps syslog snmp-server enable traps rtr snmp-server enable traps dlsw snmp-server enable traps isdn call-information snmp-server enable traps isdn layer2 snmp-server host xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1 <private community> snmp-server host xxx.xxx.xxx.xx2 <private community> Again, thanks for any information. At 01:10 PM 10/7/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Are the Cisco 6509s configured to send out link up/down traps? > >I know that we had to enable these traps on the switches in order for >Netview to receive the traps.. > >Catalina >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com >[mailto:owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Jorge A. Jiles >Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:55 PM >To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com >Subject: [nv-l] Cat6509 link down/up trap > >Hello all. Netview 7.1 on Solaris8 > >I'm not receiving link down/up traps from hour Cisco cat6509's (version >12.1(11)E1). Bellow is part of the configuration of my trapd.conf under >/usr/OV/conf/C > >I'am asumming that Cisco link down/up traps are generic to all Catalyst >switches. Do I have to load a particular MIB for Cat6509 link traps? > >I want to be sure that Netview is configured properly before checking >the >switches configuration again. > > >Cisco_Link_Down {1.3.6.1.4.1.9} 2 0 A 1 0 "Status Events" >Cisco_Link_Down trap received from enterprise $E with $# arguments: >ifIndex=$1; ifDescr=$2; ifType=$3; locIfReason=$4 >SDESC >This event occurs when the Cisco agent detects an interface has gone >down. >linkDown Trap signifies that the sending protocol entity recog >nizes a failure in one of the communication links represented in the >agent's configuration. >EDESC >Cisco_Link_Up {1.3.6.1.4.1.9} 3 0 A 1 0 "Status Events" >Cisco_Link_Up trap received from enterprise $E with $# arguments: >ifIndex=$1; ifDescr=$2; ifType=$3; locIfReason=$4 >SDESC >This event occurs when the Cisco agent detects an interface has come >back >up. linkUp trap signifies that the sending protocol entity reco >gnizes that one of the communication links represented in the agent's >configuration has come up. >EDESC > >Thanks for any help. > > > >Jorge A Jiles >Network Analyst >Computing & Network Services >University of Alberta >Edmonton, Alberta >Canada > > > > > > Jorge A Jiles Network Analyst Computing & Network Services University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Canada |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Cat6509 link down/up trap, Catalina Martinez |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] CRC and collision checking, Joe Fernandez |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Cat6509 link down/up trap, Catalina Martinez |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Ruleset + change state, Tom Hallberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web