nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:52:46 -0600
Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 15:02:02 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcO03eTgBcY5YAqRTu2XvZWU/EoMAgDPNCUA
Thread-topic: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
Turning FFDC off dropped OVWDB performance from 50% of a CPU to 15% - results 
aren't "conclusive" but sure seems dramatic to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
Behalf Of Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 5:54 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?



Jane,

this are two complete different things.

The Autotrace is more like a (source) code trace.
You (no, not you ;-)  see what code has been executed during the snapshoot
... with FDDC before the core happens.
Similar to the dbxprof tool you might got from support in the past to look
whats going on if you have performance problems or have found a possible
loop.

The nettl subsystem only trace things what the developer though what is
worth to (in different classes, subsystems).

But I might be wrong and some other guys know it better.....

Kind regards

Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Tivoli NetView EMEA L2 Support



|---------+----------------------------->
|         |           Jane Curry        |
|         |           <jane.curry@skills|
|         |           -1st.co.uk>       |
|         |           Sent by:          |
|         |           owner-nv-l@lists.u|
|         |           s.ibm.com         |
|         |                             |
|         |                             |
|         |           27.11.2003 10:44  |
|         |           Please respond to |
|         |           nv-l              |
|         |                             |
|---------+----------------------------->
  
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                |
  |       To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com                                       
                                                |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                                |
  |       Subject:  Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?                              
                                                |
  |                                                                             
                                                |
  |                                                                             
                                                |
  
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|



Many thanks, Oliver,
Does this mean that the nettl subsystem is now redundant?  It still
seems to run as ever, although I almost never had cause to use it.

Cheers,
Jane

Oliver Bruchhaeuser wrote:

>Jane,
>
>I fear this isn't really interesting for the "normal" NetView user.
>The created Autotrace packages are in binary format and you need a special
>viewer
>and a code database for the traced product to view them.
>It is only there for support. Preverably L3 support.
>
>Nervertheless the atctl command reference for your curiousity ;-):
>--------------------------
>
>

--
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2003 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All rights
reserved.








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web