nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
From: "Dietmar Gaulhofer" <DIETMAR_GAULHOFER@at.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:46:37 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:52:38 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Importance: Normal
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sensitivity:
I would strongly recommend installing this fix. It solved all our CPU
performace problems i had with 7.1.4 at the customer site. (40000 objects)



"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>@lists.us.ibm.com on 02.12.2003
14:37:51

Please respond to nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Sent by:    owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com


To:    <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc:
Subject:    RE: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?


I do not, but I will put it on my to-do list

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
Behalf Of Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:45 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?



Jane, Scott,

do you already have applied IY50663 ?
I would be very interested in ovwdb cpu usage after having this test fix
installed.

Kind regards

Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Tivoli NetView EMEA L2 Support




|---------+----------------------------->
|         |           Jane Curry        |
|         |           <jane.curry@skills|
|         |           -1st.co.uk>       |
|         |           Sent by:          |
|         |           owner-nv-l@lists.u|
|         |           s.ibm.com         |
|         |                             |
|         |                             |
|         |           01.12.2003 16:03  |
|         |           Please respond to |
|         |           nv-l              |
|         |                             |
|---------+----------------------------->
  >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  |
|
  |       To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:  Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
|
  |
|
  |
|
  >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




I've seen similar.  I am a little surprised that the default is to have
this turned on.  I might suggest the next version of the Release Notes
do at least have a large warning somewhere about performance degradation
with FFDC, if you keep the deafult as having it switched on.
Personally, I've just configured it off.

Cheers,
Jane

Barr, Scott wrote:

>Turning FFDC off dropped OVWDB performance from 50% of a CPU to 15% -
results aren't "conclusive" but sure seems dramatic to me.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
>Behalf Of Oliver Bruchhaeuser
>Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 5:54 AM
>To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
>Subject: Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
>
>
>
>Jane,
>
>this are two complete different things.
>
>The Autotrace is more like a (source) code trace.
>You (no, not you ;-)  see what code has been executed during the snapshoot
>... with FDDC before the core happens.
>Similar to the dbxprof tool you might got from support in the past to look
>whats going on if you have performance problems or have found a possible
>loop.
>
>The nettl subsystem only trace things what the developer though what is
>worth to (in different classes, subsystems).
>
>But I might be wrong and some other guys know it better.....
>
>Kind regards
>
>Oliver Bruchhaeuser
>Tivoli NetView EMEA L2 Support
>
>
>
>|---------+----------------------------->
>|         |           Jane Curry        |
>|         |           <jane.curry@skills|
>|         |           -1st.co.uk>       |
>|         |           Sent by:          |
>|         |           owner-nv-l@lists.u|
>|         |           s.ibm.com         |
>|         |                             |
>|         |                             |
>|         |           27.11.2003 10:44  |
>|         |           Please respond to |
>|         |           nv-l              |
>|         |                             |
>|---------+----------------------------->
>  >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|


>  |
|
>  |       To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
>  |       cc:
|
>  |       Subject:  Re: [nv-l] 7.1.4 performance ?
|
>  |
|
>  |
|
>  >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|


>
>
>
>Many thanks, Oliver,
>Does this mean that the nettl subsystem is now redundant?  It still
>seems to run as ever, although I almost never had cause to use it.
>
>Cheers,
>Jane
>
>Oliver Bruchhaeuser wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jane,
>>
>>I fear this isn't really interesting for the "normal" NetView user.
>>The created Autotrace packages are in binary format and you need a
special
>>viewer
>>and a code database for the traced product to view them.
>>It is only there for support. Preverably L3 support.
>>
>>Nervertheless the atctl command reference for your curiousity ;-):
>>--------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
>Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
>Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
>Copyright (c) 2003 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All rights
>reserved.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2003 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All rights
reserved.













<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web