| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Auto layout and Location.conf | 
| From: | Danny H Williams <danny@uk.ibm.com> | 
| Date: | Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:41:22 +0000 | 
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:53:46 +0000 | 
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk | 
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| 
Personally I prefer to let location.conf to do all the work. It is an
iterative development but eventually I get a picture that represents my
view of the network architecture.  If the layout is unmanageable, is it
because there are too many objects on a submap? If so then add another
location.
                                                                                
                                                       
                      "Christopher J                                            
                                                       
                      Petrina"                 To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com  
                                                       
                      <cjp8@meadwestvac        cc:                              
                                                       
                      o.com>                   Subject:  Re: [nv-l] Auto layout 
and Location.conf                                      
                      Sent by:                                                  
                                                       
                      owner-nv-l@lists.                                         
                                                       
                      us.ibm.com                                                
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
                      11/12/2003 16:17                                          
                                                       
                      Please respond to                                         
                                                       
                      nv-l                                                      
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
The is how I understood how location.conf works.   What I am doing is
updating the location.conf file and then under serversetup going and
regenerating the new map. What I did find out now is exactly what you said.
Now after I update the location.conf I simply create a new map.   But I
instantly want to turn off auto layout because it becomes unmanageable,
right after I turn it off though it stops placing the devices in the
correct containers that are defined in location.conf and simply places
those devices in the NOHA.  Should I just let auto layout run a while so it
can add them to the proper containers?
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Auto layout and Location.conf, Christopher J Petrina | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] NetView Multicast, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Auto layout and Location.conf, Christopher J Petrina | 
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] NetView Multicast, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] | 
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web