To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Simulating node/interface up/down events |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:51:29 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:23:17 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
What do you mean "NV sees no parameters with interface up/down events"? What exactly are you trying to do? In most cases you cannot spoof NetView into updating his map status just by sending him traps. My guess is that whatever it is, the code is looking for information in other varbinds of the event. Interface events now have 8 varbinds, not three nor five. The Admin Guide documentation, Appendix A, was updated for this in 7.1.4, but it is in the 7.1.3 Release Notes too that there are now 8. .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.2.0 Integer 14 fixed value of 14 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.3.0 OctetString hostname of device owning the interface .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.4.0 OctetString "Interface <if_name> Down" .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.5.0 OctetString data string consisting of Interface IP address, timestamp of the event, owning node object id, interface id, all blank delimited .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.6.0 OctetString fixed value "openview " .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.7.0 OctetString hostname of device owning the interface .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.8.0 OctetString IP address of the interface .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.9.0 OctetString "<if_name>" Note that, however, in most cases you cannot spoof NetView into updating his map status just by sending him traps. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
We have outsourced our network to BT, but still wish to retain some elements of network management so that we can correlate network with system and application events. BT have been sending us node up/down events for some while now, we import these into Netview with no difficulty. We now want them to send us interface up/down events. We thought that this would simply mean modifying their script, which sends an SNMP trap, to use specific traps of 58916866/7 instead of 58916864/5. What actually happens is that NV sees parameters with the node up/down events, but no parameters with interface up/down events. Stripping the whole thing down we end up with the following shell script fragment. snmptrap nvserv101 \ .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1 \ $AGENT_IP \ 6 $SPECIFIC_TRAP \ 0 \ .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.2.0 Integer 1 \ .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.3.0 Octetstring $AGENT \ .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1.1.4.0 Octetstring $DESCRIPTION Adding data and database parameters doesn't make any difference. Any clues as to what we are doing wrong? We are running NV 7.1.3. -- Dr. Colin Walls Project Services Enable Telephone: 01565 613705 Email: Colin.Walls@Barclays.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Discovery delays, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Simulating node/interface up/down events, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Simulating node/interface up/down events, Paul |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Simulating node/interface up/down events, colin . walls |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web