nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things
From: "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:27:47 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:36:45 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Local Subnets only is what I have setup right now.  


Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser@de.ibm.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

02/20/2004 04:21 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
        cc:        
        Subject:        Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things




Christopher,

It depends on the netmon options -X and -A.
serversetup -> netmon -> Range of automatic discovery: Local Subnet Only,
Backbone, All Networks

Oliver


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Christopher J   |
|         |           Petrina"         |
|         |           <cjp8@meadwestvac|
|         |           o.com>           |
|         |           Sent by:         |
|         |           owner-nv-l@lists.|
|         |           us.ibm.com       |
|         |                            |
|         |                            |
|         |           19.02.2004 23:18 |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           nv-l             |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |                                                                                                                     |
 |       To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com                                                                               |
 |       cc:                                                                                                           |
 |       Subject:  [nv-l] Unmanaged things                                                                             |
 |                                                                                                                     |
 |                                                                                                                     |
 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Greetings

Q1:    Why on a fresh discovery with none of the switches in setup
configured to laod something as unmanaged would I find an entire segment
unmanaged.   I was looking through the maps as the devices and segments
were being found, and found 2 segments that were unmanaged since no one
could have manually done this I assume it was generated by netview.  My
question is how did it do this and why?
  I know there is a switch in the serversetup -> config netmon daemon that
says manage objects loaded by loadhost.  We have that set to yes.


Thanks
Chris Petrina




________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web