| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things | 
| From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> | 
| Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:27:47 -0500 | 
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:36:45 +0000 | 
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk | 
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| 
 Local Subnets only is what I have setup right now. 
 Christopher, It depends on the netmon options -X and -A. serversetup -> netmon -> Range of automatic discovery: Local Subnet Only, Backbone, All Networks Oliver |---------+----------------------------> | | "Christopher J | | | Petrina" | | | <cjp8@meadwestvac| | | o.com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-nv-l@lists.| | | us.ibm.com | | | | | | | | | 19.02.2004 23:18 | | | Please respond to| | | nv-l | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | | cc: | | Subject: [nv-l] Unmanaged things | | | | | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Greetings Q1: Why on a fresh discovery with none of the switches in setup configured to laod something as unmanaged would I find an entire segment unmanaged. I was looking through the maps as the devices and segments were being found, and found 2 segments that were unmanaged since no one could have manually done this I assume it was generated by netview. My question is how did it do this and why? I know there is a switch in the serversetup -> config netmon daemon that says manage objects loaded by loadhost. We have that set to yes. Thanks Chris Petrina ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service._______________________________________________________________  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, James Shanks | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Christopher J Petrina | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things, Oliver Bruchhaeuser | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things, Oliver Bruchhaeuser | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] | 
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web