| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [nv-l] Unmanaged things |
| From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:18:22 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:27:24 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|
Greetings Q1: Why on a fresh discovery with none of the switches in setup configured to laod something as unmanaged would I find an entire segment unmanaged. I was looking through the maps as the devices and segments were being found, and found 2 segments that were unmanaged since no one could have manually done this I assume it was generated by netview. My question is how did it do this and why? I know there is a switch in the serversetup -> config netmon daemon that says manage objects loaded by loadhost. We have that set to yes. Thanks Chris Petrina |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Christopher J Petrina |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] RE: Location.conf, Leslie Clark |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Christopher J Petrina |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things, Oliver Bruchhaeuser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web