| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things |
| From: | Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser@de.ibm.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:31:15 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:41:47 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
as the name says.
NetView (netmon) will discover only your local subnet and will leave other
networks found on the edge routers unmanaged.
Oliver
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Christopher J |
| | Petrina" |
| | <cjp8@meadwestvac|
| | o.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-nv-l@lists.|
| | us.ibm.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 20.02.2004 15:27 |
| | Please respond to|
| | nv-l |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things
|
|
|
|
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Local Subnets only is what I have setup right now.
Oliver Bruchhaeuser
<oliver.bruchhaeuser@de.ibm.com> To:
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
cc:
Subject: Re:
02/20/2004 04:21 AM [nv-l] Unmanaged things
Please respond to nv-l
Christopher,
It depends on the netmon options -X and -A.
serversetup -> netmon -> Range of automatic discovery: Local Subnet Only,
Backbone, All Networks
Oliver
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Christopher J |
| | Petrina" |
| | <cjp8@meadwestvac|
| | o.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-nv-l@lists.|
| | us.ibm.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 19.02.2004 23:18 |
| | Please respond to|
| | nv-l |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: [nv-l] Unmanaged things
|
|
|
|
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Greetings
Q1: Why on a fresh discovery with none of the switches in setup
configured to laod something as unmanaged would I find an entire segment
unmanaged. I was looking through the maps as the devices and segments
were being found, and found 2 segments that were unmanaged since no one
could have manually done this I assume it was generated by netview. My
question is how did it do this and why?
I know there is a switch in the serversetup -> config netmon daemon that
says manage objects loaded by loadhost. We have that set to yes.
Thanks
Chris Petrina
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Netview 7.1.3 ignores MS SQL server, Libor Kovar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Oliver Bruchhaeuser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Unmanaged things, Christopher J Petrina |
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, larry . pytlik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web