[nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?

nv-l

[nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?

To:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:	[nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?
From:	larry.pytlik@clorox.com
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:06:52 -0800
Delivery-date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:13:33 +0000
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sensitivity:

How do I configure Netview to use HTTP for node up/down for a few "special" network nodes? The particular nodes do not have SNMP and Ping is blocked but http is allowed.
Our Netview version is 7.1.3FP02.

Regards
Larry Pytlik
Clorox
Network Engineering

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, larry . pytlik <= Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, James Shanks Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, larry . pytlik Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, Paul

Previous by Date:	Re: [nv-l] RE: Location.conf, Leslie Clark
Next by Date:	Re: [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Previous by Thread:	[nv-l] Unmanaged things, Christopher J Petrina
Next by Thread:	Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, James Shanks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd