To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp? |
From: | larry.pytlik@clorox.com |
Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:42 -0800 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:32:43 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sensitivity: |
That is unfortunate, we are trying to replace "What's UP Gold" network monitor which does this type of monitoring and fold this function it into Netview, (UNIX). I would like to hear from anyone who has implemented HTTP node up/down using Netview in a UNIX environment. Regards Larry Pytlik Clorox Network Engineering Please respond to nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
How do I configure Netview to use HTTP for node up/down for a few "special" network nodes? The particular nodes do not have SNMP and Ping is blocked but http is allowed. Our Netview version is 7.1.3FP02. Regards Larry Pytlik Clorox Network Engineering |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Loadhosts and other issues of interest, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or sn mp ?, Duppong, Jason |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] The use of HTTP for node up/down instead of ping or snmp?, Paul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web