nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

[nv-l] "Down" router sub-interfaces show as "Added"

To: "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: [nv-l] "Down" router sub-interfaces show as "Added"
From: "Qureshi, Fawad" <Fawad.Qureshi@ssa.gov>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:05:55 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:15:37 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

NV 7.1.3 / AIX 5.1

 

Forgot to include the traps from trapd.log:

 

1077834855 7  Thu Feb 26 17:34:15 2004 bi-wcr2-n5ee2.ss.gov N Interface ATM4/0/0.435-aal5 Added

1077835234 3  Thu Feb 26 17:40:34 2004 bi-wcr2-n5ee2.ss.gov N Interface ATM4/0/0.435-aal5 down.

 

When does Netview generate the Interface Added trap? Is it after the configuration poll tells Netview that a new interface is detected, or something else causes this?

 

Thanks.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Qureshi, Fawad
Sent:
Friday, February 27, 2004 1:24 PM
To: 'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'
Subject: [nv-l] "Down" router sub-interfaces show as "Added"

 

NV 7.1.3 / AIX 5.1

 

The router people claim that the (Added) traps for a router sub-interface showing up in their event window (see below) are incorrect as this sub-interface has been consistently down for past several days, and there are no entries in router log files for such addition.

 

There are several of these traps for several sub-interfaces.

 

These are Netview generated traps (SPECIFIC: 58785792, GENERIC 6 - ENTERPRISE netview6000). Any reason why Netview would detect these down interfaces as Added? Thanks.

 

Cheers

 

Fawad Qureshi

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web