To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] devices sending traps |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:30:46 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:39:04 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFE37D6089.6663437E-ON85256E5B.0079C0EC-85256E5B.0079EA5A@mead.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Not usually. Most vendor traps never go to netmon. Cisco Linkup/LinkDown are the only exceptions I know of, unless they have changed that. but with new node discovery off, it wouldn't matter even if you pinged them from the command line. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
When a device (router/switch) is configured to forward traps to netview. If that device is not in the Limited seedfile, will netview attempt to discover that device and add it to the objects database? we haev some Alcatel switches that are configured to send traps to Netview, but they are not in the Limited Seedfile we have (and discover new nodes is Checked OFF). Will Netview attempt to discern these machines and try to put them in the objects database? Chris Petrina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] devices sending traps, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] NetView servmon, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] devices sending traps, Christopher J Petrina |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] devices sending traps, Christopher J Petrina |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web