nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:40:25 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:48:54 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <OFED143979.5B08CA90-ON85256E70.005C3A97-85256E70.005F38C2@mead.com>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Well, I'm not in front of a system right now. Try that little pulldown where it says what to search by and see if there is something else. It might be referred to as something other than label. Also , I think the wildcarding can do a little more than just *.  Set it to wildcard and try things like regular expressions to limit your search . I'm thinking like  label\.*com$ to exclude the interfaces, etc.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit



"Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

04/08/2004 01:20 PM
Please respond to
nv-l

To
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
cc
Subject
Re: [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names






I understand the concept of this sincel the label does not necessarily ahve to be unique, but the object sleection name does.  My Quesiton I guess then would be can I search by label.  This is coming from searching in the Web Console.  We want to search for a device and we give it the label name in the search bar in the Web Console and it does not return the device.  By adding a * to the end as a wildcard will give any device with that begin label name.  Which could be many devices.  We are unable to tell without going through the maps and finding the actual object what its selection name is.  Is this just the way it was designed, do we just need to keep using the wildcard (*) or is there a way to search by label?


Thank you

Chris Petrina


Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

04/08/2004 11:41 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
       To:        nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

       cc:        

       Subject:        Re: [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names





No. It will use the short name (up to the first dot) for the label, but the Selection Name will be the resolved name, whatever that is. The way to change this is to enter all names in /etc/hosts. You should not do this if it is a very long list, as it becomes a performance problem as well as an administrative burden.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


"Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

04/07/2004 01:18 PM
Please respond to
nv-l


To nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
cc
Subject [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names










Is there anywhere in NV to tell it to not use the suffix for fully qualified names.  We check our /etc/hosts file first for a device if it is not there, then we say go check the DNS server.  When it finds it in the DNS server it uses the fully qualified name.  Anyway to suppress the domain suffix in NV?


-Chris Petrina

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________

This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco
Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential,
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The
information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s)
named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that
any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco
immediately at postmaster@MeadWestvaco.com.
_______________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________



________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________

This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco
Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential,
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The
information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s)
named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that
any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco
immediately at postmaster@MeadWestvaco.com.
_______________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web