To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect |
From: | Joe Fernandez <jfernand@kardinia.com> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Feb 2005 23:56:25 +1100 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:05:14 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F0C26AB@nlspm204.emea.corp. eds.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
At 08:11 AM 31-01-05 +0000, you wrote: Thanks Joe, There are no files in the ../snmpCollect directory (files with 0 length). My NumberConcurrentSnmp is 100 and I made change on number of objects in the database (from 10000 ro 20000) only. Regards, David David,I believe the default value of NumberConcurrentSnmp is 5, so 100 sounds ambitious to me. Did you increment it in steps and monitor the effect?I would turn it back down, see if data is being collected, then increment it in steps and check. Try the -S switch also and look at the configuration information that it writes to the trace file. This should tell you more about what is happening. Joe Fernandez Kardinia Software jfernand@kardinia.com www.kardinia.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l], Louie Ching |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect, Liu, David |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l], Louie Ching |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect, Liu, David |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web