To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect |
From: | Joe Fernandez <jfernand@kardinia.com> |
Date: | Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:37:09 +1100 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:46:03 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F0C26B2@nlspm204.emea.corp. eds.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
At 09:18 AM 02-02-05 +0000, you wrote: Joe, Yes, the default was 5, and I do have verbose trace turned on. But from the trace file I compare (50 and 100), I cannot see clear difference. Maybe I was wrong. Thx & rgds, David David,With the -S,-V,-T switches on, you should see the values returned by the gets in the trace file. Is this happening at 5, 50 and 100 without any significant differences? Joe Fernandez Kardinia Software jfernand@kardinia.com www.kardinia.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] TBSM adapter, Jane Curry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect, Liu, David |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect, Liu, David |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect, Liu, David |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web