nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect

To: "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect
From: "Liu, David" <david.liu@eds.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:47:30 -0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:48:44 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Joe,

I didn't try 5, but with 50 and 100 no clear difference. I'll try 5 later
then. Thanks.

Rgds,
David

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
Behalf Of Joe Fernandez
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:37 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] snmpCollect


At 09:18 AM 02-02-05 +0000, you wrote:
>Joe,
>
>Yes, the default was 5, and I do have verbose trace turned on.
>
>But from the trace file I compare (50 and 100), I cannot see clear
>difference. Maybe I was wrong.
>
>Thx & rgds,
>David

David,

With the -S,-V,-T  switches on, you should see the values returned by the 
gets in the trace file.
Is this happening at 5, 50 and 100 without any significant differences?


Joe Fernandez
Kardinia Software
jfernand@kardinia.com
www.kardinia.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web