nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

[nv-l] Traps not formatting right!

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] Traps not formatting right!
From: Larry Fagan <larrytechie@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:10:10 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:10:53 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=6KH1bT+pfg5Szx7KvSZStVfWDZQvlJW++RW8xZlxeVa9WN/wipRK2LsxdTxCB5Ew+Wa7IyFt3c/KqCk7QOF3ksz6T5qhyvDIMlEPbr3EDmPzVJ2/EAprLHEHKPFJ1YuUd3soAdhJ7ccDyh7xAvaNxQnKh7toIVF7CyUiklA7lqA= ;
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Hi,
Back again.. I have sucessfully loaded Nokia System
trap definitions into netview using mib2trap command.
They are defined under 1.3.6.1.4.1.94.1.21.1.0. in
xnmtrap. Now when we receive traps from nokia device,
the TEC shows as below:

Trap found with no known format in trapd.conf(4) 
Enterprise ENTERPRISES (1.3.6.1.4.1.94.1.21.1)
community test  generic trap:6 specific trap:4 
Timestamp:315688386 Agentaddr:testnokia.us.com
args(4):  [1] hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionIndex.3.1
(Integer): 1  [2]
hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionLabel.3.1 (OctetString):
/dev/wd0f  [3] hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionSize.3.1
(Integer): 396952  [4]
host.hrDevice.hrFSTable.hrFSEntry.hrFSMountPoint.1
(OctetString): /  "

Take a look at the OID in the event. It is without
last digit "0" from xnmtrap. Now my question is,why is
the diffence in OID? how do i decode this unformatted
trap. What am i supposed to understand from this
unformatted trap? 
Many thanks as usual to all..
Larry

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web